WMB vs EPD

For growth investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 5x. On forward P/E, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Williams Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 48x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) delivered a total return of +232. 0%, compared to +104. 8% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +357. 0% versus EPD's +116. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.

P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus The Williams Companies, Inc. 's 0. 17β — meaning WMB is approximately 169% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Williams Companies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMB leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 11. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMB leads at 36. 8% versus 13. 1% for EPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMB leads at 42. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 48x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMB: 7. 1% to $79. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 2. 7% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 2. 7% yield, +357. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMB: +357. 0%, EPD: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.