WTMA
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-26.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WTMA vs ATMV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ATMV
AlphaVest Acquisition Corp
Shell Companies
Market Cap$33M
5Y Perf.-14.1%
WTMA vs ATMV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WTMA | ATMV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Shell Companies |
| Market Cap | $21M | $33M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-476K |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1K | $4K |
WTMA vs ATMV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WTMA
ATMV
| Stock | Jan 23 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Welsbach Technology… (WTMA) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
| AlphaVest Acquisiti… (ATMV) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTMA vs ATMV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ATMV leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WTMA
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick
WTMA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -1.45, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 0.00x
- Lower D/E ratio (0.0% vs 6.9%)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ATMV
AlphaVest Acquisition Corp
The Banking Pick
ATMV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 46.9%
- 2.0% 10Y total return vs WTMA's -13.2%
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 0.00x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ATMV | -59.7% NII/revenue growth vs WTMA's -70.0% |
| Quality / Margins | ATMV | 14.8% margin vs WTMA's 6.6% |
| Stability / Safety | WTMA | Lower D/E ratio (0.0% vs 6.9%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ATMV | -11.9% vs WTMA's -29.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ATMV | -2.5% ROA vs WTMA's -32.4%, ROIC -1.9% vs -176.8% |
WTMA vs ATMV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWTMALAGGINGATMV
ATMVAlphaVest Acquisition…
2leads
WTMAWelsbach Technology M…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ATMVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WTMA1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WTMA2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ATMV7/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ATMV5/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WTMA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTMA and ATMV operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | ATMVAlphaVest Acquisi… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$476,106 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $51,618 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | -8.0% |
WTMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
WTMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | ATMVAlphaVest Acquisi… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $33M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $34M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 21.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1082.23x |
WTMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMV leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMV delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-134 for WTMA. WTMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATMV's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATMV scores 4/9 vs WTMA's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | ATMVAlphaVest Acquisi… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -134.0% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.4% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -176.8% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.2% | -2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,185 | $4,215 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
ATMV leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ATMV leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATMV five years ago would be worth $10,198 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,684 for WTMA. Over the past 12 months, ATMV leads with a -11.9% total return vs WTMA's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATMV at 0.1% vs WTMA's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | ATMVAlphaVest Acquisi… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.6% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.1% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.4% | +0.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.2% | +2.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.2% | +2.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.6% | +0.1% |
ATMV leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTMA is the less volatile stock with a -1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATMV's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTMA currently trades 30.8% from its 52-week high vs ATMV's 24.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | ATMVAlphaVest Acquisi… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.45x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.37 | $42.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.50 | $5.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.8% | +24.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 12.6M |
WTMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | ATMVAlphaVest Acquisi… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +57.2% | +100.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
WTMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ATMV leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
Best OverallWelsbach Technology Metals … (WTMA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WTMA vs ATMV: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTMA or ATMV a better buy right now?
AlphaVest Acquisition Corp (ATMV) offers the better valuation at 21.
9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WTMA or ATMV?
Over the past 5 years, AlphaVest Acquisition Corp (ATMV) delivered a total return of +2.
0%, compared to -13. 2% for Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. (WTMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATMV returned +2. 0% versus WTMA's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WTMA or ATMV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
(WTMA) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 45β versus AlphaVest Acquisition Corp's 0. 64β — meaning ATMV is approximately -144% more volatile than WTMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. (WTMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for AlphaVest Acquisition Corp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — WTMA or ATMV?
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
(WTMA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for AlphaVest Acquisition Corp — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTMA leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for ATMV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WTMA leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — WTMA or ATMV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is WTMA or ATMV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
(WTMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 45)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTMA: -13. 2%, ATMV: +2. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between WTMA and ATMV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Closest Rival
Compare ATMV vs PSFE
PSFE is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ATMV.
Segment Rival
Compare WTMA vs MP
MP overlaps with WTMA in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand Peer Set
Expand With PSFE + NHIC
PSFE and NHIC are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.