WTMA
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-23.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WTMA vs UUUU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
Uranium
Market Cap$5.83B
5Y Perf.+135.7%
WTMA vs UUUU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WTMA | UUUU |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Uranium |
| Market Cap | $21M | $5.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -108.3% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $676M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1K | $65M |
WTMA vs UUUU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WTMA
UUUU
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Welsbach Technology… (WTMA) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
| Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) | 100 | 235.7 | +135.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTMA vs UUUU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: UUUU leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WTMA
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick
WTMA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -1.45, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 0.00x
- 6.6% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
- Lower D/E ratio (0.0% vs 99.0%)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
The Growth Play
UUUU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -15.6%, EPS growth -32.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 74.0%
- 9.8% 10Y total return vs WTMA's -13.2%
- Beta 1.85, current ratio 30.69x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | UUUU | -15.6% revenue growth vs WTMA's -70.0% |
| Quality / Margins | WTMA | 6.6% margin vs UUUU's -82.7% |
| Stability / Safety | WTMA | Lower D/E ratio (0.0% vs 99.0%) |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | UUUU | +409.8% vs WTMA's -29.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UUUU | -6.5% ROA vs WTMA's -32.4%, ROIC -8.5% vs -176.8% |
WTMA vs UUUU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUUUULAGGINGWTMA
WTMAWelsbach Technology M…
0leads
UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WTMAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
UUUU1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
UUUU6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UUUU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UUUU and WTMA operate at a comparable scale, with $85M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$87M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -108.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -82.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -102.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +112.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | +69.2% |
UUUU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WTMA and UUUU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -63.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 88.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 8.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — WTMA and UUUU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — WTMA and UUUU each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UUUU delivers a -10.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-10 in annual profit, vs $-134 for WTMA. WTMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UUUU's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WTMA scores 3/9 vs UUUU's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -134.0% | -10.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.4% | -6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -176.8% | -8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -78.2% | -10.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $611M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,185 | $65M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $676M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Evenly matched — WTMA and UUUU each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UUUU five years ago would be worth $39,363 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,684 for WTMA. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +409.8% total return vs WTMA's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 57.2% vs WTMA's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.6% | +40.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.1% | +409.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.4% | +288.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.2% | +293.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.2% | +983.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.6% | +57.2% |
UUUU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WTMA and UUUU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTMA is the less volatile stock with a -1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UUUU's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UUUU currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs WTMA's 30.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.45x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.37 | $27.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.50 | $4.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.8% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 9.8M |
Evenly matched — WTMA and UUUU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | WTMAWelsbach Technolo… | UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $24.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +57.2% | +0.9% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
UUUU leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallEnergy Fuels Inc. (UUUU)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WTMA vs UUUU: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTMA or UUUU a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Energy Fuels Inc.
(UUUU) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WTMA or UUUU?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Fuels Inc.
(UUUU) delivered a total return of +293. 6%, compared to -13. 2% for Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. (WTMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UUUU returned +983. 0% versus WTMA's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WTMA or UUUU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
(WTMA) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 45β versus Energy Fuels Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning UUUU is approximately -227% more volatile than WTMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp. (WTMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 99% for Energy Fuels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — WTMA or UUUU?
Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
(WTMA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -129. 9% for Energy Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTMA leads at 0. 0% versus -153. 4% for UUUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UUUU leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — WTMA or UUUU?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is WTMA or UUUU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welsbach Technology Metals Acquisition Corp.
(WTMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 45)). Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTMA: -13. 2%, UUUU: +983. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between WTMA and UUUU?
These companies operate in different sectors (WTMA (Financial Services) and UUUU (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.