XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$2.84B
5Y Perf.-35.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
XMTR vs FVRR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$405M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
XMTR vs FVRR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | XMTR | FVRR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $2.84B | $405M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $687M | $429M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-62M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.6% | 2.9% |
| Forward P/E | 84.0x | 5.4x |
| Total Debt | $349M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $129M |
XMTR vs FVRR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
XMTR
FVRR
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) | 100 | 64.5 | -35.5% |
| Fiverr Internationa… (FVRR) | 100 | 4.6 | -95.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XMTR vs FVRR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FVRR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Xometry, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
The Growth Play
XMTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 25.9%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.7%
- -35.5% 10Y total return vs FVRR's -71.8%
- 25.9% revenue growth vs FVRR's 10.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
The Income Pick
FVRR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.97
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.94x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XMTR | 25.9% revenue growth vs FVRR's 10.1% |
| Value | FVRR | Lower P/E (5.4x vs 84.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | FVRR | 6.7% margin vs XMTR's -9.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FVRR | Beta 0.97 vs XMTR's 1.94, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | XMTR | +84.3% vs FVRR's -58.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FVRR | 3.1% ROA vs XMTR's -8.9%, ROIC -0.2% vs -5.7% |
XMTR vs FVRR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
XMTR vs FVRR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFVRRLAGGINGXMTR
XMTRXometry, Inc.
1leads
FVRRFiverr International …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XMTRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FVRR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FVRR3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FVRR8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XMTR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FVRR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XMTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $687M annually — 1.6x FVRR's $429M. FVRR is the more profitable business, keeping 6.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XMTR's -9.0%. On growth, XMTR holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | XMTRXometry, Inc. | FVRRFiverr Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $687M | $429M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$62M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $103M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.5% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | +9.7% |
FVRR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FVRR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | XMTRXometry, Inc. | FVRRFiverr Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $405M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $281M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.23x | 20.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 84.04x | 5.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.14x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.36x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.89x |
FVRR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FVRR leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FVRR delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-22 for XMTR. FVRR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVRR scores 8/9 vs XMTR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | XMTRXometry, Inc. | FVRRFiverr Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.9% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.26x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | -$124M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $129M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $349M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.84x | — |
FVRR leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XMTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XMTR five years ago would be worth $6,454 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $626 for FVRR. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +84.3% total return vs FVRR's -58.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 62.2% vs FVRR's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | XMTRXometry, Inc. | FVRRFiverr Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | -42.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.3% | -58.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +326.6% | -59.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.5% | -93.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.5% | -71.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.2% | -26.2% |
XMTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XMTR and FVRR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FVRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XMTR's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 76.4% from its 52-week high vs FVRR's 33.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | XMTRXometry, Inc. | FVRRFiverr Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.94x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.87 | $34.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.52 | $9.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +33.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.5 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 842K | 937K |
Evenly matched — XMTR and FVRR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XMTR as "Buy" and FVRR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.5% upside for FVRR (target: $17) vs 14.1% for XMTR (target: $64).
| Metric | XMTRXometry, Inc. | FVRRFiverr Internatio… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.33 | $16.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +8.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FVRR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XMTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallFiverr International Ltd. (FVRR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
XMTR vs FVRR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XMTR or FVRR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xometry, Inc.
(XMTR) is the stronger pick with 25. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (5. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XMTR or FVRR?
On forward P/E, Fiverr International Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 5. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XMTR or FVRR?
Over the past 5 years, Xometry, Inc.
(XMTR) delivered a total return of -35. 5%, compared to -93. 7% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XMTR returned -35. 5% versus FVRR's -71. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XMTR or FVRR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Xometry, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XMTR is approximately 100% more volatile than FVRR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XMTR or FVRR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xometry, Inc.
(XMTR) is pulling ahead at 25. 9% versus 10. 1% for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fiverr International Ltd. grew EPS 16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -18. 4% for Xometry, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XMTR leads at 21. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XMTR or FVRR?
Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 9% net margin versus -9. 0% for Xometry, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FVRR leads at -0. 3% versus -6. 6% for XMTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FVRR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XMTR or FVRR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) trades at 5. 4x forward P/E versus 84. 0x for Xometry, Inc. — 78. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FVRR: 49. 5% to $16. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — XMTR or FVRR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XMTR or FVRR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fiverr International Ltd.
(FVRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FVRR: -71. 8%, XMTR: -35. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XMTR and FVRR?
These companies operate in different sectors (XMTR (Industrials) and FVRR (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FVRR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(XMTR: 29.5% · FVRR: -1.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.