YORW vs GWRS

For growth investors, Global Water Resources, Inc.

(GWRS) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The York Water Company (YORW). The York Water Company (YORW) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The York Water Company (YORW) is the cheapest at 21.

0x versus Global Water Resources, Inc. at 65. 1x. On forward P/E, The York Water Company is actually cheaper at 18. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Global Water Resources, Inc. wins at 3. 02x versus The York Water Company's 9. 89x.

Over the past 5 years, The York Water Company (YORW) delivered a total return of -32.

0%, compared to -47. 8% for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GWRS returned +39. 8% versus YORW's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The York Water Company (YORW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

08β versus Global Water Resources, Inc. 's 0. 71β — meaning GWRS is approximately 810% more volatile than YORW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 97% for The York Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global Water Resources, Inc.

(GWRS) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 3. 4% for The York Water Company (YORW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The York Water Company grew EPS -2. 1% year-over-year, compared to -54. 2% for Global Water Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YORW leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.

9% net margin versus 5. 3% for Global Water Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YORW leads at 35. 8% versus 12. 8% for GWRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 02x versus The York Water Company's 9. 89x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The York Water Company (YORW) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 53. 0x for Global Water Resources, Inc. — 35. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 3. 0% for The York Water Company (YORW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The York Water Company (YORW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

08), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (YORW: +25. 0%, GWRS: +39. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.