Steel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ZKIN vs IIIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
ZKIN vs IIIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication |
| Market Cap | $8M | $519M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $179M | $678M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 5.9% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $39M |
ZKIN vs IIIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZK International Gr… (ZKIN) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 151.3 | +51.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZKIN vs IIIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZKIN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +34.0% vs IIIN's -20.2%
IIIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth 112.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.8% 10Y total return vs ZKIN's -97.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.97x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs ZKIN's -34.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.0% margin vs ZKIN's -3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (1.1% vs 95.8%) | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs IIIN's -20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs ZKIN's -9.3%, ROIC 14.1% vs -4.4% |
ZKIN vs IIIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZKIN vs IIIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IIIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $678M annually — 3.8x ZKIN's $179M. IIIN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZKIN's -3.8%. On growth, IIIN holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $179M | $678M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $191,770 | $439,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +15.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.5% | +23.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.7% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ZKIN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $519M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $484M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.03x | 12.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.04x | 27.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-25 for ZKIN. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZKIN's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IIIN scores 6/9 vs ZKIN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.1% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.3% | +10.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.2% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.31x | 1192.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IIIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IIIN five years ago would be worth $8,783 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $388 for ZKIN. Over the past 12 months, ZKIN leads with a +34.0% total return vs IIIN's -20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IIIN at 2.9% vs ZKIN's -34.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | -17.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.0% | -20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | +8.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | -12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +40.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.5% | +2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZKIN and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZKIN is the less volatile stock with a -0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIIN's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIIN currently trades 64.1% from its 52-week high vs ZKIN's 31.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.53x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.47 | $41.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $24.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.8% | +64.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 38.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 209K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
IIIN is the only dividend payer here at 4.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
IIIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZKIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ZKIN vs IIIN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZKIN or IIIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZKIN or IIIN?
Over the past 5 years, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) delivered a total return of -12. 2%, compared to -96. 1% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIIN returned +40. 8% versus ZKIN's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZKIN or IIIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZK International Group Co.
, Ltd. (ZKIN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 53β versus Insteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning IIIN is approximately -289% more volatile than ZKIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 96% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZKIN or IIIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus -34. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Insteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to -23. 5% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IIIN leads at -7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZKIN or IIIN?
Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -5. 6% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIIN leads at 8. 4% versus -3. 5% for ZKIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIIN leads at 14. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ZKIN or IIIN?
In this comparison, IIIN (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ZKIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ZKIN or IIIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZK International Group Co.
, Ltd. (ZKIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 53)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZKIN: -97. 6%, IIIN: +40. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ZKIN and IIIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZKIN (Basic Materials) and IIIN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. IIIN pays a dividend while ZKIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.