Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ZM vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
ZM vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $33.30B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.87B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.90B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 77.0% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.1% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.4x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $31M | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.27B | $30.71B |
ZM vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom Communications… (ZM) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZM vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.95
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 4.33x
- PEG 0.82 vs GOOGL's 0.99
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs ZM's 74.8%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs ZM's 4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs ZM's 4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.4x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.82 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.0% margin vs GOOGL's 37.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs GOOGL's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs ZM's +37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs ZM's 15.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs 10.4% |
ZM vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZM vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 86.8x ZM's $4.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 39.0% (ZM) to 37.9% (GOOGL). On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.9B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.9B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.0% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.4% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ZM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.5x trailing earnings, ZM trades at a 52% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZM offers better value at 0.78x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.3B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32.1B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.53x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.44x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.78x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.52x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.84x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.40x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.31x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $19 for ZM. ZM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOGL's 0.14x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.4% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.9% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.2B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31M | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,670 for ZM. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs ZM's +37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs ZM's 19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.1% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.8% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.2% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.3% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.8% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.9% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZM and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOGL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.50 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.15 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.2 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZM as "Hold" and GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for GOOGL (target: $406) vs -7.2% for ZM (target: $101). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $100.56 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.9% | +0.9% |
ZM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GOOGL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ZM vs GOOGL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZM or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM). Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) a "Buy" — based on 82 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZM or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Zoom Communications, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Zoom Communications, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZM or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -63. 3% for Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus ZM's +74. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZM or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Alphabet Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning GOOGL is approximately 33% more volatile than ZM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 14% for Alphabet Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZM or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus 4. 4% for Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zoom Communications, Inc. grew EPS 92. 5% year-over-year, compared to 34. 5% for Alphabet Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOOGL leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZM or GOOGL?
Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus 32. 8% for Alphabet Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 23. 1% for ZM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZM leads at 77. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZM or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) trades at 18. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOOGL: 2. 1% to $406. 28.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZM or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ZM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZM or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, ZM: +74. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZM and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZM (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.