Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ZNTL vs AUPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ZNTL vs AUPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $251M | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $298M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-124M | $298M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 41.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $80M |
ZNTL vs AUPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zentalis Pharmaceut… (ZNTL) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| Aurinia Pharmaceuti… (AUPH) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZNTL vs AUPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZNTL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +137.8% vs AUPH's +95.9%
AUPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.97
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs ZNTL's -84.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.4% revenue growth vs ZNTL's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs ZNTL's 2.41, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.8% vs AUPH's +95.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 47.6% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 16.6% vs -40.5% |
ZNTL vs AUPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZNTL vs AUPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUPH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AUPH and ZNTL operate at a comparable scale, with $298M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $298M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$144M | $144M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$124M | $298M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$126M | $166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +41.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +55.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +24.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | +56.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ZNTL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $251M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $254M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.84x | 7.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 3.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AUPH delivers a 64.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $64 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ZNTL. AUPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZNTL's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AUPH scores 7/9 vs ZNTL's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.6% | +64.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.7% | +47.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.5% | +16.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.5% | +18.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $80M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $75M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 16.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AUPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AUPH five years ago would be worth $12,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $627 for ZNTL. Over the past 12 months, ZNTL leads with a +137.8% total return vs AUPH's +95.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AUPH at 16.5% vs ZNTL's -47.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +156.9% | +3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.8% | +95.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.4% | +58.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.7% | +23.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | +500.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.4% | +16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AUPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AUPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZNTL's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AUPH currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs ZNTL's 50.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.41x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.95 | $16.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.13 | $7.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.6% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.4 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZNTL as "Buy" and AUPH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 184.1% upside for ZNTL (target: $10) vs -20.5% for AUPH (target: $13).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $12.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.8% |
AUPH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZNTL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ZNTL vs AUPH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZNTL or AUPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZNTL or AUPH?
Over the past 5 years, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) delivered a total return of +23. 3%, compared to -93. 7% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AUPH returned +500. 4% versus ZNTL's -84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZNTL or AUPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 41β — meaning ZNTL is approximately 148% more volatile than AUPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 18% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZNTL or AUPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -100. 0% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to 18. 0% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZNTL or AUPH?
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the more profitable company, earning 101. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 101. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AUPH leads at 37. 1% versus 0. 0% for ZNTL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AUPH leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ZNTL or AUPH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZNTL: 184.
1% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZNTL or AUPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ZNTL or AUPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(AUPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), +500. 4% 10Y return). Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) carries a higher beta of 2. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AUPH: +500. 4%, ZNTL: -84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZNTL and AUPH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZNTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AUPH is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.