Insurance - Life
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AAME vs GL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Life
AAME vs GL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $53M | $11.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $208M | $6.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $1.16B |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $145M |
AAME vs GL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic American C… (AAME) | 100 | 145.8 | +45.8% |
| Globe Life Inc. (GL) | 100 | 197.9 | +97.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AAME vs GL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AAME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 37.9%, current ratio 8.84x
- Beta 0.40, yield 0.8%, current ratio 8.84x
GL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 175.7% 10Y total return vs AAME's -33.2%
- 3.8% revenue growth vs AAME's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs AAME's 0.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs AAME's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs GL's 0.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GL's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.7% vs GL's +27.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs AAME's 1.2%, ROIC 13.4% vs -3.6% |
AAME vs GL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AAME vs GL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GL is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 28.8x AAME's $208M. GL is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAME's 2.5%. On growth, AAME holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $208M | $6.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +33.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.1% | +9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AAME leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53M | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $14.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.22x | 10.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 1.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.50x | 9.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GL delivers a 20.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $5 for AAME. AAME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GL's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GL scores 8/9 vs AAME's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +20.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.4% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $145M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | 11.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GL five years ago would be worth $14,826 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,650 for AAME. Over the past 12 months, AAME leads with a +52.7% total return vs GL's +27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GL at 12.8% vs AAME's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.4% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.7% | +27.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.9% | +43.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | +48.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | +175.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.9% | +12.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AAME and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAME is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GL's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GL currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs AAME's 69.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.40x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.71 | $156.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.57 | $116.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 67.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 450K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AAME and GL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, AAME offers the higher dividend yield at 0.78% vs GL's 0.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $171.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +7.4% |
GL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AAME leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AAME vs GL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAME or GL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Globe Life Inc.
(GL) is the stronger pick with 3. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Atlantic American Corporation (AAME). Globe Life Inc. (GL) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Globe Life Inc. (GL) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AAME or GL?
Over the past 5 years, Globe Life Inc.
(GL) delivered a total return of +48. 3%, compared to -33. 5% for Atlantic American Corporation (AAME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GL returned +175. 7% versus AAME's -33. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AAME or GL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
40β versus Globe Life Inc. 's 0. 48β — meaning GL is approximately 20% more volatile than AAME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 44% for Globe Life Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AAME or GL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globe Life Inc.
(GL) is pulling ahead at 3. 8% versus 0. 8% for Atlantic American Corporation (AAME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Globe Life Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -724. 4% for Atlantic American Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GL leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AAME or GL?
Globe Life Inc.
(GL) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus -2. 3% for Atlantic American Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GL leads at 24. 4% versus -2. 8% for AAME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GL leads at 33. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AAME or GL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Atlantic American Corporation (AAME) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 7% for Globe Life Inc. (GL).
07Is AAME or GL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Globe Life Inc.
(GL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 0. 7% yield, +175. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GL: +175. 7%, AAME: -33. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AAME and GL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AAME is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.