Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $85M | $9.07B | $896.00B | $6.90B | $7.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $280.33B | $0.00 | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-450M | $57.05B | $-506M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 60.0% | — | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 25.9% | — | -7.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.4x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $441K | $0.00 | $942.38B | $72K | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $262M | $343.34B | $902M | $357M |
AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aardvark Therapeuti… (AARD) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 121.2 | +21.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 163.2 | +63.2% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 275.0 | +175.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AARD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NUVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.87
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs AARD's -150.9%
- 20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +110.9% vs AARD's -64.7%
Among these 5 stocks, KYMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs AARD's -150.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs AARD's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.9% vs AARD's -64.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
NUVL leads 1 • AARD leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $280.3B | $0 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$75M | -$346M | $81.4B | -$532M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$450M | $57.0B | -$506M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | -$313M | $100.9B | -$407M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +60.0% | — | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +25.9% | — | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +20.4% | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +36.0% | — | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -130.2% | -17.8% | +16.0% | -14.1% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AARD and JPM and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $9.1B | $896.0B | $6.9B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $8.8B | $1.50T | $6.0B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.48x | -21.07x | 16.00x | -12.14x | -23.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.40x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.36x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 3.20x | — | 179.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 7.18x | 2.47x | 7.19x | 4.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.88x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.7% | -42.8% | +15.9% | -68.2% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.3% | -37.8% | +1.3% | -62.2% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -32.5% | +4.5% | — | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.0% | -34.4% | +8.9% | -68.3% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 2.60x | 0.00x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$47M | -$262M | $599.0B | -$902M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $262M | $343.3B | $902M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $441,000 | $0 | $942.4B | $72,000 | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -36.13x | 0.74x | — | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NUVL and IMVT and KYMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $65,733 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,725 for AARD. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +110.9% total return vs AARD's -64.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs AARD's -35.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.4% | +22.2% | -0.5% | +29.8% | +18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.7% | +58.2% | +21.8% | +110.9% | +82.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.7% | +183.3% | +138.2% | +55.0% | +242.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.7% | +557.3% | +118.2% | +213.0% | +70.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.7% | +557.3% | +465.8% | +237.9% | +159.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.2% | +41.5% | +33.6% | +15.7% | +50.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NUVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NUVL is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AARD's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs AARD's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 0.87x | 0.94x | 1.66x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.94 | $123.62 | $337.25 | $36.27 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $71.13 | $262.71 | $14.32 | $36.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.7% | +99.7% | +95.1% | +92.7% | +83.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.6 | 67.0 | 59.1 | 57.9 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 155K | 2.0M | 7.0M | 1.9M | 492K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AARD as "Buy", NUVL as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 652.1% upside for AARD (target: $29) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.33 | $132.74 | $339.75 | $43.67 | $112.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 17 | 61 | 23 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NUVL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +557. 3%, compared to -72. 7% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +557. 3% versus AARD's -72. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 70β — meaning AARD is approximately 211% more volatile than NUVL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -177. 9% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AARD: 652.
1% to $29. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. AARD, NUVL, IMVT, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, AARD: -72. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AARD and NUVL and JPM and IMVT and KYMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (AARD (Healthcare) and NUVL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AARD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while AARD, NUVL, IMVT, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.