Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AARD logo
AARD
NUVL logo
NUVL
JPM logo
JPM
IMVT logo
IMVT
KYMR logo
KYMR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AARD
Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.-69.4%
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.07B
5Y Perf.+64.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+21.2%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+63.2%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+175.0%

AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AARD logoAARD
NUVL logoNUVL
JPM logoJPM
IMVT logoIMVT
KYMR logoKYMR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$85M$9.07B$896.00B$6.90B$7.04B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$280.33B$0.00$51M
Net Income (TTM)$-70M$-450M$57.05B$-506M$-315M
Gross Margin60.0%33.2%
Operating Margin25.9%-7.0%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$441K$0.00$942.38B$72K$82M
Cash & Equiv.$47M$262M$343.34B$902M$357M

AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AARD
NUVL
JPM
IMVT
KYMR
StockFeb 25Jun 26Return
Aardvark Therapeuti… (AARD)10030.6-69.4%
Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL)100164.4+64.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100121.2+21.2%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100163.2+63.2%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100275.0+175.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Nuvalent, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. IMVT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
AARD
Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock
The Healthcare Pick

AARD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.
The Income Pick

NUVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 0.87
  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
  • Beta 0.87, current ratio 15.27x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs AARD's -150.9%
  • 20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +110.9% vs AARD's -64.7%
Best for: momentum
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, KYMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs AARD's -150.9%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyNUVL logoNUVLBeta 0.87 vs AARD's 2.70
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMVT logoIMVT+110.9% vs AARD's -64.7%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
AARDAardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock

Segment breakdown not available.

NUVLNuvalent, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGKYMR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%.

MetricAARD logoAARDAardvark Therapeu…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$280.3B$0$51M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$75M-$346M$81.4B-$532M-$352M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$70M-$450M$57.0B-$506M-$315M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$62M-$313M$100.9B-$407M-$244M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.0%+33.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+25.9%-7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.4%-6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+36.0%-4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-130.2%-17.8%+16.0%-14.1%+13.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AARD and JPM and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricAARD logoAARDAardvark Therapeu…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$85M$9.1B$896.0B$6.9B$7.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$38M$8.8B$1.50T$6.0B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.48x-21.07x16.00x-12.14x-23.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.20x179.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.80x7.18x2.47x7.19x4.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — AARD and JPM and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAARD logoAARDAardvark Therapeu…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-61.7%-42.8%+15.9%-68.2%-25.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-56.3%-37.8%+1.3%-62.2%-22.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-32.5%+4.5%-24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-70.0%-34.4%+8.9%-68.3%-27.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–921524
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x2.60x0.00x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$47M-$262M$599.0B-$902M-$275M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$262M$343.3B$902M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$441,000$0$942.4B$72,000$82M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.13x0.74x-2119.53x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NUVL and IMVT and KYMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $65,733 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,725 for AARD. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +110.9% total return vs AARD's -64.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs AARD's -35.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAARD logoAARDAardvark Therapeu…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-70.4%+22.2%-0.5%+29.8%+18.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-64.7%+58.2%+21.8%+110.9%+82.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.7%+183.3%+138.2%+55.0%+242.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.7%+557.3%+118.2%+213.0%+70.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.7%+557.3%+465.8%+237.9%+159.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-35.2%+41.5%+33.6%+15.7%+50.8%
Evenly matched — NUVL and IMVT and KYMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NUVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NUVL is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AARD's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs AARD's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAARD logoAARDAardvark Therapeu…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.70x0.87x0.94x1.66x0.91x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.94$123.62$337.25$36.27$103.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.35$71.13$262.71$14.32$36.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+21.7%+99.7%+95.1%+92.7%+83.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.667.059.157.956.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded155K2.0M7.0M1.9M492K
NUVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: AARD as "Buy", NUVL as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 652.1% upside for AARD (target: $29) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAARD logoAARDAardvark Therapeu…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.33$132.74$339.75$43.67$112.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts817612326
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NUVL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AARD vs NUVL vs JPM vs IMVT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?

Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.

(NUVL) delivered a total return of +557. 3%, compared to -72. 7% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +557. 3% versus AARD's -72. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nuvalent, Inc.

(NUVL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 70β — meaning AARD is approximately 211% more volatile than NUVL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -177. 9% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AARD: 652.

1% to $29. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. AARD, NUVL, IMVT, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is AARD or NUVL or JPM or IMVT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, AARD: -72. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between AARD and NUVL and JPM and IMVT and KYMR?

These companies operate in different sectors (AARD (Healthcare) and NUVL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AARD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while AARD, NUVL, IMVT, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.