Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AARD vs RYTM vs VNDA vs VKTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AARD vs RYTM vs VNDA vs VKTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $79M | $6.01B | $361M | $3.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $217M | $218M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-204M | $-240M | $-472M |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.4% | 71.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -90.9% | -73.6% | — |
| Total Debt | $441K | $246M | $13M | $137K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $54M | $85M | $166M |
AARD vs RYTM vs VNDA vs VKTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aardvark Therapeuti… (AARD) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
| Rhythm Pharmaceutic… (RYTM) | 100 | 161.0 | +61.0% |
| Vanda Pharmaceutica… (VNDA) | 100 | 123.3 | +23.3% |
| Viking Therapeutics… (VKTX) | 100 | 99.6 | -0.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AARD vs RYTM vs VNDA vs VKTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AARD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RYTM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.8%, EPS growth 28.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.2%
- 45.8% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1%
- +35.2% vs AARD's -67.8%
VNDA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.08
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 2.39x
- Beta 1.08, current ratio 2.39x
- Beta 1.08 vs AARD's 2.69
VKTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 21.9% 10Y total return vs RYTM's 192.2%
- 4.7% margin vs VNDA's -110.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.8% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs VNDA's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs AARD's 2.69 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.2% vs AARD's -67.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -44.6% ROA vs VKTX's -65.3%, ROIC -32.2% vs -44.4% |
AARD vs RYTM vs VNDA vs VKTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AARD vs RYTM vs VNDA vs VKTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RYTM leads in 2 of 6 categories
VNDA leads 1 • AARD leads 0 • VKTX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RYTM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNDA and VKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $218M and $0 in trailing revenue. RYTM is the more profitable business, keeping -93.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNDA's -110.0%. On growth, RYTM holds the edge at +83.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $217M | $218M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$75M | -$196M | -$150M | -$502M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$204M | -$240M | -$472M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | -$76M | -$127M | -$340M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +89.4% | +71.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -90.9% | -73.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -93.8% | -110.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -35.1% | -58.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +83.8% | +3.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -130.2% | -2.5% | -64.0% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AARD and RYTM and VNDA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $79M | $6.0B | $361M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $6.2B | $288M | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.38x | -28.19x | -1.63x | -8.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 31.66x | 1.67x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 40.96x | 1.10x | 5.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VNDA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VNDA delivers a -61.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-61 in annual profit, vs $-2 for RYTM. VKTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RYTM's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RYTM scores 5/9 vs VKTX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.7% | -2.0% | -61.4% | -71.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.3% | -45.2% | -44.6% | -65.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -70.1% | -32.2% | -44.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.0% | -58.9% | -33.6% | -51.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.77x | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$47M | $192M | -$72M | -$166M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $54M | $85M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $441,000 | $246M | $13M | $137,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -12.41x | — | -15687.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RYTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VKTX five years ago would be worth $47,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,544 for AARD. Over the past 12 months, RYTM leads with a +35.2% total return vs AARD's -67.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RYTM at 70.5% vs AARD's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -72.4% | -16.5% | -26.1% | -19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.8% | +35.2% | +33.2% | -1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +395.5% | -6.7% | +20.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +359.4% | -68.2% | +370.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +192.2% | -43.4% | +2188.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | +70.5% | -2.3% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RYTM and VNDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VNDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AARD's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RYTM currently trades 71.7% from its 52-week high vs AARD's 20.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.69x | 1.21x | 1.08x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.94 | $122.20 | $9.94 | $43.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $60.70 | $4.14 | $22.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.3% | +71.7% | +61.4% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.8 | 45.5 | 41.1 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 155K | 616K | 1.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AARD as "Buy", RYTM as "Buy", VNDA as "Buy", VKTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 705.8% upside for AARD (target: $29) vs 59.9% for RYTM (target: $140).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.33 | $140.20 | $14.25 | $93.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 20 | 19 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RYTM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). VNDA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
AARD vs RYTM vs VNDA vs VKTX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AARD or RYTM or VNDA or VKTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RYTM) is the stronger pick with 45. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 7% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VNDA). Analysts rate Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AARD or RYTM or VNDA or VKTX?
Over the past 5 years, Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
(VKTX) delivered a total return of +370. 6%, compared to -74. 6% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VKTX returned +21. 9% versus AARD's -74. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AARD or RYTM or VNDA or VKTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(VNDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 69β — meaning AARD is approximately 149% more volatile than VNDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 177% for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AARD or RYTM or VNDA or VKTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RYTM) is pulling ahead at 45. 8% versus 8. 7% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VNDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 28. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1068. 8% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RYTM leads at 100. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AARD or RYTM or VNDA or VKTX?
Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc.
Common Stock (AARD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -103. 6% for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AARD leads at 0. 0% versus -101. 2% for RYTM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNDA leads at 94. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AARD or RYTM or VNDA or VKTX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AARD or RYTM or VNDA or VKTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RYTM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), +192. 2% 10Y return). Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RYTM: +192. 2%, AARD: -74. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AARD and RYTM and VNDA and VKTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AARD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RYTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.