Insurance - Life
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ABLLL vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
ABLLL vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.50B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 87.5% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 25.7x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $386M | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $132M | $43M |
ABLLL vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abacus Life, Inc. 9… (ABLLL) | 100 | 103.8 | +3.8% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 97.1 | -2.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABLLL vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABLLL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.03
- Rev growth 68.6%, EPS growth -312.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 70.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, Low D/E 91.2%, current ratio 2.55x
CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 231.6% 10Y total return vs ABLLL's 25.1%
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 25.7x)
- 43.1% margin vs ABLLL's 5.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.6% revenue growth vs CSWC's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 25.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.1% margin vs ABLLL's 5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs CSWC's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.7% vs ABLLL's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs ABLLL's 1.2%, ROIC 3.5% vs -0.1% |
ABLLL vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABLLL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABLLL and CSWC operate at a comparable scale, with $197M and $164M in trailing revenue. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABLLL's 5.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$111M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.5% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -56.6% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +123.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +191.7% | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CSWC's 27.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABLLL's 392.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -75.31x | 16.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.66x | 10.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 392.45x | 27.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.35x | 8.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.28x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for ABLLL. ABLLL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSWC's 1.08x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $254M | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $132M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $386M | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.74x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,514 for ABLLL. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +33.7% total return vs ABLLL's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.9% vs ABLLL's 7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.4% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.3% | +33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | +76.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | +52.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | +231.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.8% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABLLL and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABLLL is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.36 | $24.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.52 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 666K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CSWC is the only dividend payer here at 10.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
CSWC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ABLLL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ABLLL vs CSWC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABLLL or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Abacus Life, Inc.
9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (ABLLL) is the stronger pick with 68. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABLLL or CSWC?
On forward P/E, Capital Southwest Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABLLL or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +52.
1%, compared to +25. 1% for Abacus Life, Inc. 9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (ABLLL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +231. 6% versus ABLLL's +25. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABLLL or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abacus Life, Inc.
9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (ABLLL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 84β — meaning CSWC is approximately 2614% more volatile than ABLLL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Abacus Life, Inc. 9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (ABLLL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 108% for Capital Southwest Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABLLL or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abacus Life, Inc.
9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (ABLLL) is pulling ahead at 68. 6% versus 7. 7% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital Southwest Corporation grew EPS -28. 3% year-over-year, compared to -312. 5% for Abacus Life, Inc. 9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABLLL or CSWC?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus -21. 4% for Abacus Life, Inc. 9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSWC leads at 48. 5% versus -0. 8% for ABLLL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABLLL leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABLLL or CSWC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) trades at 10.
1x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for Abacus Life, Inc. 9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABLLL or CSWC?
In this comparison, CSWC (10.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ABLLL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABLLL or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Abacus Life, Inc.
9. 875% Fixed Rate Senior Notes due 2028 (ABLLL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABLLL: +25. 1%, CSWC: +231. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABLLL and CSWC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABLLL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CSWC pays a dividend while ABLLL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.