Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ABTS vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
ABTS vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $3M | $622M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -22.1% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94K | $95M |
ABTS vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abits Group Inc. (ABTS) | 100 | 12.9 | -87.1% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 202.1 | +102.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABTS vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.68
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.1%, current ratio 0.18x
- Beta 0.68, current ratio 0.18x
BTBT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- -58.2% 10Y total return vs ABTS's -99.8%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ABTS's -16.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs ABTS's -16.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BTBT's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.0% vs ABTS's -52.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BTBT's 0.5% |
ABTS vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABTS vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 29.2x ABTS's $6M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABTS's -11.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.1% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.9% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.8% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ABTS leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ABTS's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 9.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $622M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $540M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.37x | 9.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.71x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 3.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-15 for ABTS. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ABTS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs ABTS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.2% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.3% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94,132 | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BTBT five years ago would be worth $1,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $129 for ABTS. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -4.0% total return vs ABTS's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -5.4% vs ABTS's -56.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -77.1% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.6% | -4.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -83.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.2% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABTS and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 42.4% from its 52-week high vs ABTS's 10.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.86 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.9% | +42.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.7 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 491K | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ABTS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ABTS vs BTBT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABTS or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for Abits Group Inc. (ABTS). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABTS or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) delivered a total return of -83. 4%, compared to -98. 7% for Abits Group Inc. (ABTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -58. 2% versus ABTS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABTS or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abits Group Inc.
(ABTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 393% more volatile than ABTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 23% for Abits Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ABTS or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -16. 5% for Abits Group Inc. (ABTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 30. 8% for Abits Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABTS or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -11. 5% for Abits Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -22. 1% for ABTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ABTS or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ABTS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ABTS or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Abits Group Inc.
(ABTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABTS: -99. 8%, BTBT: -58. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ABTS and BTBT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ABTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.