Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ABVE vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
ABVE vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $6M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -21.2% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $118M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $952K | $10.73B |
ABVE vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above Food Ingredie… (ABVE) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABVE vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABVE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs ABVE's -93.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs ABVE's -7.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs ABVE's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs ABVE's 4.25 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs ABVE's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs ABVE's -67.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs -29.7% |
ABVE vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ABVE vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 7422.7x ABVE's $95M. WMT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABVE's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.2% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ABVE leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.24x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-81 for ABVE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs ABVE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.9% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.1% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.7% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.4% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $117M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $952,280 | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.66x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $703 for ABVE. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs ABVE's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs ABVE's -58.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -63.5% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.3% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.7% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABVE's 4.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs ABVE's 10.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.25x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.56 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.2% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ABVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ABVE vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABVE or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 47. 7x trailing P/E (44. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ABVE or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -93. 0% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus ABVE's -93. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ABVE or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock's 4. 25β — meaning ABVE is approximately 3537% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ABVE or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -7. 1% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -252. 8% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ABVE or WMT?
Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -14. 5% for Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMT leads at 4. 2% versus -11. 4% for ABVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ABVE or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. ABVE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ABVE or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Above Food Ingredients Inc. Common Stock (ABVE) carries a higher beta of 4. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, ABVE: -93. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ABVE and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WMT pays a dividend while ABVE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.