ACNT
Ascent Industries Co.
Steel
Market Cap$127M
5Y Perf.+87.8%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisACNT
TRS
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ACNT vs TRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TRS
TriMas Corporation
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.+72.5%
ACNT vs TRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  ACNT |  TRS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $127M | $1.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77M | $868M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $909M |
| Gross Margin | 21.8% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.8% | 6.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 24.7x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $505M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $30M |
ACNT vs TRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ACNT
TRS
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ascent Industries C… (ACNT) | 100 | 187.8 | +87.8% |
| TriMas Corporation (TRS) | 100 | 172.5 | +72.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACNT vs TRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TRS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Ascent Industries Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇TRS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ACNT
Ascent Industries Co.
The Income Pick
ACNT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 15.3%, current ratio 6.72x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 6.72x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TRS
TriMas Corporation
The Growth Play
TRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -30.2%, EPS growth 400.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.9%
- 151.7% 10Y total return vs ACNT's 93.7%
- -30.2% revenue growth vs ACNT's -57.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  TRS | -30.2% revenue growth vs ACNT's -57.9% |
| Value |  ACNT | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 24.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRS | 104.7% margin vs ACNT's 1.6% |
| Stability / Safety | ACNT | Beta 0.47 vs TRS's 1.09, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TRS | 0.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRS | +51.7% vs ACNT's +10.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRS | 54.6% ROA vs ACNT's 1.1%, ROIC 0.9% vs -6.6% |
ACNT vs TRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
ACNT vs TRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLACNTLAGGINGTRS
TRSTriMas Corporation
2leads
ACNTAscent Industries Co.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TRSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TRS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ACNT4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TRS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ACNT1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $868M annually — 11.3x ACNT's $77M. TRS is the more profitable business, keeping 104.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACNT's 1.6%. On growth, ACNT holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ACNTAscent Industries… | TRSTriMas Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77M | $868M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $909M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +6.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +104.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | -30.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +70.3% |
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ACNT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ACNTAscent Industries… | TRSTriMas Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $127M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.22x | 14.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.93x | 24.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 28.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.69x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 2.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.52x |
ACNT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACNT and TRS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRS delivers a 101.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $1 for ACNT. ACNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRS's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACNT scores 6/9 vs TRS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ACNTAscent Industries… | TRSTriMas Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +101.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +54.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.6% | +0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.0% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | $475M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $505M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.87x |
Evenly matched — ACNT and TRS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRS five years ago would be worth $13,295 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,545 for ACNT. Over the past 12 months, TRS leads with a +51.7% total return vs ACNT's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRS at 15.0% vs ACNT's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ACNTAscent Industries… | TRSTriMas Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +51.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.3% | +52.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.4% | +33.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.7% | +151.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +15.0% |
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACNT and TRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRS's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRS currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs ACNT's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ACNTAscent Industries… | TRSTriMas Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.92 | $43.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.62 | $26.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 57.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 73K | 400K |
Evenly matched — ACNT and TRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ACNT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ACNT as "Buy" and TRS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for ACNT (target: $18) vs -8.0% for TRS (target: $38). TRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ACNTAscent Industries… | TRSTriMas Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | +6.6% |
ACNT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TRS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ACNT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallAscent Industries Co. (ACNT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ACNT vs TRS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACNT or TRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the stronger pick with -30.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 9% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). TriMas Corporation (TRS) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (24. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACNT or TRS?
On forward P/E, Ascent Industries Co.
is actually cheaper at 16. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACNT or TRS?
Over the past 5 years, TriMas Corporation (TRS) delivered a total return of +33.
0%, compared to +25. 4% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRS returned +151. 7% versus ACNT's +93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACNT or TRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ascent Industries Co.
(ACNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus TriMas Corporation's 1. 09β — meaning TRS is approximately 135% more volatile than ACNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 72% for TriMas Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACNT or TRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriMas Corporation (TRS) is pulling ahead at -30.
2% versus -57. 9% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriMas Corporation grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to 56. 7% for Ascent Industries Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRS leads at -9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACNT or TRS?
TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus -7. 5% for Ascent Industries Co. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRS leads at 2. 2% versus -9. 0% for ACNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACNT leads at 22. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACNT or TRS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ascent Industries Co.
(ACNT) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 7x for TriMas Corporation — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACNT: 28. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACNT or TRS?
In this comparison, TRS (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. ACNT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACNT or TRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ascent Industries Co.
(ACNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACNT: +93. 7%, TRS: +151. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACNT and TRS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACNT (Basic Materials) and TRS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.