TRS
TriMas Corporation
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.+75.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TRS vs SLGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$4.28B
5Y Perf.+21.1%
TRS vs SLGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TRS | SLGN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $1.57B | $4.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $868M | $6.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $909M | $283M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.2% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $505M | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $1.08B |
TRS vs SLGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TRS
SLGN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TriMas Corporation (TRS) | 100 | 175.9 | +75.9% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TRS vs SLGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SLGN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. TriMas Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TRS
TriMas Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
TRS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 148.1% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 82.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 71.6%, current ratio 2.52x
- 104.7% margin vs SLGN's 4.3%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
SLGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.22x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLGN | 10.7% revenue growth vs TRS's -30.2% |
| Value | SLGN | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 26.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRS | 104.7% margin vs SLGN's 4.3% |
| Stability / Safety | SLGN | Beta 0.66 vs TRS's 1.04 |
| Dividends | SLGN | 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs TRS's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRS | +69.8% vs SLGN's -23.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRS | 54.6% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 0.9% vs 8.7% |
TRS vs SLGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
TRS vs SLGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTRSLAGGINGSLGN
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
2leads
TRSTriMas Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SLGNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TRS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SLGN5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TRS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TRS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
SLGN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 7.6x TRS's $868M. TRS is the more profitable business, keeping 104.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, SLGN holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $868M | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $966M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $909M | $283M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $307M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +104.7% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.4% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.3% | -6.3% |
TRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SLGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, TRS trades at a 6% valuation discount to SLGN's 15.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLGN's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRS's 28.7x.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.11x | 15.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.48x | 10.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.73x | 8.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.41x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.67x | 10.13x |
SLGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRS delivers a 101.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. TRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.72x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLGN's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs TRS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +101.1% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +54.6% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $475M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $505M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.87x | 3.36x |
TRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRS five years ago would be worth $12,655 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,218 for SLGN. Over the past 12 months, TRS leads with a +69.8% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRS at 18.2% vs SLGN's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.8% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | -23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.0% | -10.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +2.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.1% | +82.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | -3.7% |
TRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRS and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRS's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRS currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 71.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.48 | $57.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.65 | $36.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +71.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 479K | 767K |
Evenly matched — TRS and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
SLGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRS as "Buy" and SLGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs -8.7% for TRS (target: $38). For income investors, SLGN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.98% vs TRS's 0.39%.
| Metric | TRSTriMas Corporation | SLGNSilgan Holdings I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $50.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +1.6% |
SLGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TRS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLGN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallTriMas Corporation (TRS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TRS vs SLGN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRS or SLGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). TriMas Corporation (TRS) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriMas Corporation (TRS) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRS or SLGN?
On trailing P/E, TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus Silgan Holdings Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRS or SLGN?
Over the past 5 years, TriMas Corporation (TRS) delivered a total return of +26.
5%, compared to +2. 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRS returned +148. 1% versus SLGN's +82. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRS or SLGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus TriMas Corporation's 1. 04β — meaning TRS is approximately 57% more volatile than SLGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriMas Corporation (TRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 72% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TRS or SLGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -30. 2% for TriMas Corporation (TRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriMas Corporation grew EPS 400. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLGN leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TRS or SLGN?
TriMas Corporation (TRS) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLGN leads at 10. 2% versus 2. 2% for TRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRS leads at 20. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TRS or SLGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for TriMas Corporation — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 24. 7% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TRS or SLGN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 4% for TriMas Corporation (TRS).
09Is TRS or SLGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGN: +82. 0%, TRS: +148. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TRS and SLGN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SLGN pays a dividend while TRS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TRS: -30.4% · SLGN: 6.5%)Net Margin>
%
(TRS: 104.7% · SLGN: 4.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(TRS: 14.1x · SLGN: 15.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.