Financial - Conglomerates
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ACOG vs BIIB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
ACOG vs BIIB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $98M | $29.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $9.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | 86.4% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | -250.1% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $6.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $3.01B |
ACOG vs BIIB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Cognition Inc… (ACOG) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACOG vs BIIB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACOG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 42.1%
- -11.3% 10Y total return vs BIIB's -18.1%
BIIB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.40, current ratio 2.68x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.4% revenue growth vs ACOG's -116.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs ACOG's -232.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs ACOG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.2% vs ACOG's -34.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs ACOG's -41.8%, ROIC 6.5% vs -32.4% |
ACOG vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACOG vs BIIB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIIB is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.9B annually — 910.6x ACOG's $11M. BIIB is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACOG's -2.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$30M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.4% | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -146.2% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $29.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $33.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.38x | 22.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.57x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB delivers a 7.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ACOG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs ACOG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -54.1% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.4% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.4% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACOG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACOG five years ago would be worth $8,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,926 for BIIB. Over the past 12 months, BIIB leads with a +51.2% total return vs ACOG's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACOG at -3.9% vs BIIB's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | +51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -36.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -50.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -18.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.9% | -13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACOG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs ACOG's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.54 | $205.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.50 | $121.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.6% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ACOG as "Buy" and BIIB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.2% upside for ACOG (target: $14) vs 9.1% for BIIB (target: $218).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $218.16 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BIIB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACOG leads in 1 (Total Returns).
ACOG vs BIIB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACOG or BIIB a better buy right now?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock (ACOG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ACOG or BIIB?
Over the past 5 years, Alpha Cognition Inc.
Common Stock (ACOG) delivered a total return of -11. 3%, compared to -50. 7% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACOG returned -11. 3% versus BIIB's -18. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ACOG or BIIB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock's 1. 29β — meaning ACOG is approximately 218% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ACOG or BIIB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Cognition Inc.
Common Stock grew EPS 42. 1% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ACOG or BIIB?
Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -202. 2% for Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIIB leads at 19. 1% versus -221. 7% for ACOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACOG leads at 81. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ACOG or BIIB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACOG: 122.
2% to $14. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ACOG or BIIB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ACOG or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIIB: -18. 1%, ACOG: -11. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ACOG and BIIB?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACOG (Financial Services) and BIIB (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.