Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ACON vs XTNT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
ACON vs XTNT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $3M | $81M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75.73B | $133M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7.23T | $2M |
| Gross Margin | 9.0% | 62.0% |
| Operating Margin | -93.1% | 4.8% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $35M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12.02T | $6M |
ACON vs XTNT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aclarion, Inc. (ACON) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Xtant Medical Holdi… (XTNT) | 100 | 88.9 | -11.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACON vs XTNT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACON is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1000K%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.8%
- 1000K% revenue growth vs XTNT's 28.4%
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
XTNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.69
- -97.6% 10Y total return vs ACON's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 81.8%, current ratio 2.35x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1000K% revenue growth vs XTNT's 28.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs ACON's -95.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs ACON's 0.98 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.5% vs ACON's -55.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs ACON's -211.6%, ROIC -12.8% vs -12.9% |
ACON vs XTNT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACON vs XTNT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XTNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACON is the larger business by revenue, generating $75.7B annually — 569.0x XTNT's $133M. XTNT is the more profitable business, keeping 1.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACON's -95.5%. On growth, ACON holds the edge at +999999.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75.7B | $133M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7.05T | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7.23T | $2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7.16T | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +62.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -93.1% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -95.5% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.6% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +999999.0% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.9% | +123.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ACON leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $81M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12.02T | $110M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.24x | -4.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
XTNT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XTNT delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ACON. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACON scores 4/9 vs XTNT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.9% | -12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -109.9% | -17.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12.02T | $29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12.02T | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $35M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XTNT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XTNT five years ago would be worth $3,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ACON. Over the past 12 months, XTNT leads with a +13.5% total return vs ACON's -55.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XTNT at -3.9% vs ACON's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.1% | -23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.7% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -11.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -66.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.9% | -3.9% |
Risk & Volatility
XTNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACON's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XTNT currently trades 60.7% from its 52-week high vs ACON's 27.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.03 | $0.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $0.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.3% | +60.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 61.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 103K | 143K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ACON is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $10196.68 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +43.3% | 0.0% |
XTNT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ACON vs XTNT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACON or XTNT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aclarion, Inc.
(ACON) is the stronger pick with 999999% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 28. 4% for Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. (XTNT). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ACON or XTNT?
Over the past 5 years, Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) delivered a total return of -66. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Aclarion, Inc. (ACON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XTNT returned -97. 6% versus ACON's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ACON or XTNT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus Aclarion, Inc. 's 0. 98β — meaning ACON is approximately 43% more volatile than XTNT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ACON or XTNT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aclarion, Inc.
(ACON) is pulling ahead at 999999% versus 28. 4% for Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc. (XTNT). Over a 3-year CAGR, ACON leads at 106. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ACON or XTNT?
Xtant Medical Holdings, Inc.
(XTNT) is the more profitable company, earning -14. 0% net margin versus -95. 5% for Aclarion, Inc. — meaning it keeps -14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XTNT leads at -10. 3% versus -93. 1% for ACON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XTNT leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ACON or XTNT?
In this comparison, ACON (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. XTNT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ACON or XTNT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aclarion, Inc.
(ACON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACON: -100. 0%, XTNT: -97. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ACON and XTNT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ACON pays a dividend while XTNT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.