Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACRS vs DAWN vs IMVT vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ACRS vs DAWN vs IMVT vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $586M | $2.22B | $5.53B | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $158M | $0.00 | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65M | $-107M | $-464M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | 73.3% | 89.1% | — | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | -9.8% | -80.8% | — | -168.6% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3M | $98K | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $197M | $714M | $222M |
ACRS vs DAWN vs IMVT vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aclaris Therapeutic… (ACRS) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 179.6 | +79.6% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 99.9 | -0.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACRS vs DAWN vs IMVT vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.30
- Beta 0.30, current ratio 5.28x
- Beta 0.30 vs RCUS's 1.95
- +288.8% vs IMVT's +96.1%
DAWN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.6%, EPS growth -2.0%
- 20.6% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2%
- -20.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- 3.2% margin vs ACRS's -8.3%
RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.6% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ACRS's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +288.8% vs IMVT's +96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -20.7% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
ACRS vs DAWN vs IMVT vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACRS vs DAWN vs IMVT vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories
RCUS leads 1 • ACRS leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAWN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -67.8% (DAWN) to -8.3% (ACRS). On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $158M | $0 | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$76M | -$124M | -$487M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$65M | -$107M | -$464M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$47M | -$108M | -$423M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.3% | +89.1% | — | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | -80.8% | — | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | -67.8% | — | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | -68.0% | — | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.9% | +83.9% | — | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.2% | +70.0% | +19.7% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RCUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $586M | $2.2B | $5.5B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $566M | $2.0B | $4.8B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.17x | -20.70x | -9.97x | -7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 74.83x | 14.06x | — | 10.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.78x | 5.05x | 5.83x | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAWN delivers a -23.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DAWN scores 4/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.0% | -23.4% | -47.1% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.5% | -20.7% | -44.1% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -53.5% | -30.5% | — | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.7% | -26.7% | -66.1% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$194M | -$714M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $197M | $714M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3M | $98,000 | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAWN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,118 for ACRS. Over the past 12 months, ACRS leads with a +288.8% total return vs IMVT's +96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAWN at 18.2% vs ACRS's -16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.8% | +143.3% | +5.1% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +288.8% | +241.7% | +96.1% | +209.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +65.1% | +40.9% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.8% | -8.4% | +62.4% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.3% | -8.4% | +173.6% | +45.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.7% | +18.2% | +12.1% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACRS and DAWN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs RCUS's 86.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.35x | 1.37x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.89 | $21.53 | $30.09 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $5.64 | $13.36 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +100.0% | +90.5% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.0 | 80.3 | 60.2 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 4.9M | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACRS as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 105.8% upside for ACRS (target: $10) vs 10.3% for DAWN (target: $24).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $23.75 | $45.50 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 12 | 23 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DAWN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ACRS vs DAWN vs IMVT vs RCUS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACRS or DAWN or IMVT or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 2% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS). Analysts rate Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ACRS or DAWN or IMVT or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -78. 8% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus ACRS's -76. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ACRS or DAWN or IMVT or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
(ACRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 544% more volatile than ACRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ACRS or DAWN or IMVT or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus -58. 2% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 69. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ACRS or DAWN or IMVT or RCUS?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -829. 6% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -975. 9% for ACRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ACRS or DAWN or IMVT or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ACRS or DAWN or IMVT or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
(ACRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACRS: -76. 3%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ACRS and DAWN and IMVT and RCUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.