Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACU vs ACCO vs MMM vs SPB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Business Equipment & Supplies
Conglomerates
Household & Personal Products
ACU vs ACCO vs MMM vs SPB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Business Equipment & Supplies | Conglomerates | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $159M | $375M | $74.98B | $1.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $151M | $1.55B | $25.02B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $74M | $2.79B | $105M |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 30.7% | 39.5% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 7.9% | 19.6% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.1x | 4.8x | 16.6x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $921M | $12.94B | $654M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $64M | $5.24B | $124M |
ACU vs ACCO vs MMM vs SPB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acme United Corpora… (ACU) | 100 | 195.5 | +95.5% |
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| 3M Company (MMM) | 100 | 109.9 | +9.9% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 166.1 | +66.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACU vs ACCO vs MMM vs SPB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACU has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- 166.6% 10Y total return vs MMM's 32.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 4.21x
- Beta 0.80, yield 1.4%, current ratio 4.21x
ACCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.8x vs 16.6x)
- 7.1% yield, vs SPB's 2.4%
MMM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and quality.
- 1.5% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
- 11.1% margin vs SPB's 3.8%
SPB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.4%
- PEG 1.15 vs ACU's 11.31
- +30.1% vs MMM's +5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.5% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 16.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.1% margin vs SPB's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs ACCO's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs SPB's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.1% vs MMM's +5.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs SPB's 3.0%, ROIC 7.9% vs 3.9% |
ACU vs ACCO vs MMM vs SPB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACU vs ACCO vs MMM vs SPB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MMM leads in 1 of 6 categories
ACCO leads 1 • ACU leads 1 • SPB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMM is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.0B annually — 166.1x ACU's $151M. MMM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPB's 3.8%. On growth, ACCO holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $151M | $1.6B | $25.0B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $177M | $5.2B | $214M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $74M | $2.8B | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $49M | $2.1B | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +30.7% | +39.5% | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +7.9% | +19.6% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +4.8% | +11.1% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +3.2% | +8.2% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | +8.3% | +1.3% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | +2.4% | -39.7% | +48.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 61% valuation discount to MMM's 24.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPB offers better value at 1.57x vs ACU's 11.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $159M | $375M | $75.0B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $188M | $1.2B | $82.7B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.80x | 9.23x | 23.96x | 20.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.10x | 4.83x | 16.55x | 14.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.11x | — | — | 1.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.92x | 6.80x | 15.20x | 10.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 0.25x | 3.01x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 0.57x | 16.32x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.02x | 7.37x | 53.71x | 11.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMM delivers a 65.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $65 in annual profit, vs $6 for SPB. ACU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MMM's 2.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACU scores 7/9 vs MMM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +11.3% | +65.3% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.9% | +3.2% | +7.5% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +5.5% | +28.1% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +6.1% | +16.1% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 1.39x | 2.73x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29M | $856M | $7.7B | $531M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,596 | $64M | $5.2B | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $921M | $12.9B | $654M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.39x | 2.50x | 6.52x | 3.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACU and MMM and SPB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACU five years ago would be worth $10,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,075 for ACCO. Over the past 12 months, SPB leads with a +30.1% total return vs MMM's +5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMM at 21.8% vs ACCO's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | +12.1% | -10.7% | +31.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.1% | +22.8% | +5.8% | +30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.8% | -4.4% | +80.7% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | -39.3% | -3.1% | -7.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | -35.1% | +32.5% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | -1.5% | +21.8% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACU and ACCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACU is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACCO's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACCO currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs MMM's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.33x | 1.06x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.31 | $4.29 | $177.41 | $86.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.50 | $2.81 | $137.70 | $49.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +94.6% | +81.0% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 74.3 | 48.8 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 1.2M | 3.6M | 318K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACU and ACCO and SPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACU as "Buy", ACCO as "Hold", MMM as "Hold", SPB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs 8.1% for SPB (target: $85). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs ACU's 1.37%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | $166.75 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 | 33 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +7.1% | +1.5% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $0.29 | $2.18 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +6.4% | +17.8% |
MMM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ACCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ACU vs ACCO vs MMM vs SPB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 3M Company (MMM) is the stronger pick with 1.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acme United Corporation (ACU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus 3M Company at 24. 0x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus Acme United Corporation's 11. 31x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB?
Over the past 5 years, Acme United Corporation (ACU) delivered a total return of +0.
8%, compared to -39. 3% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACU returned +166. 6% versus ACCO's -35. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus ACCO Brands Corporation's 1. 33β — meaning ACCO is approximately 67% more volatile than ACU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acme United Corporation (ACU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for 3M Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 3M Company (MMM) is pulling ahead at 1.
5% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to -20. 5% for 3M Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACU leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB?
3M Company (MMM) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus 2. 7% for ACCO Brands Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MMM leads at 18. 3% versus 4. 4% for SPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MMM leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus Acme United Corporation's 11. 31x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Acme United Corporation — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 97. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 1. 4% for Acme United Corporation (ACU).
09Is ACU or ACCO or MMM or SPB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 1. 4% yield, +166. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACU: +166. 6%, ACCO: -35. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACU and ACCO and MMM and SPB?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACU (Consumer Defensive) and ACCO (Industrials) and MMM (Industrials) and SPB (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACU is a small-cap deep-value stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; MMM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.