Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACU vs WMT vs TGT vs LCUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
ACU vs WMT vs TGT vs LCUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $159M | $1.04T | $57.36B | $163M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $151M | $703.06B | $106.25B | $651M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $-28M |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 4.1% | 5.3% | -2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.1x | 44.7x | 15.7x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $67.09B | $5.59B | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $10.73B | $5.49B | $4M |
ACU vs WMT vs TGT vs LCUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acme United Corpora… (ACU) | 100 | 195.5 | +95.5% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.9 | +2.9% |
| Lifetime Brands, In… (LCUT) | 100 | 126.4 | +26.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACU vs WMT vs TGT vs LCUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 4.21x
- Beta 0.80, yield 1.4%, current ratio 4.21x
- 5.7% margin vs LCUT's -4.2%
- 9.9% ROA vs LCUT's -4.9%, ROIC 7.9% vs 4.1%
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs ACU's 166.6%
- PEG 4.06 vs ACU's 11.31
- 4.7% revenue growth vs LCUT's -5.1%
TGT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.6%
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%
LCUT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +123.7% vs ACU's +11.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs LCUT's -5.1% | |
| Value | PEG 4.06 vs 11.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs LCUT's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs LCUT's 1.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.7% vs ACU's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs LCUT's -4.9%, ROIC 7.9% vs 4.1% |
ACU vs WMT vs TGT vs LCUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACU vs WMT vs TGT vs LCUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACU leads in 2 of 6 categories
WMT leads 2 • LCUT leads 1 • TGT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 4667.3x ACU's $151M. ACU is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LCUT's -4.2%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $151M | $703.1B | $106.2B | $651M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $42.8B | $8.7B | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $22.9B | $4.0B | -$28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +4.1% | +5.3% | -2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +3.3% | +3.8% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | +35.1% | +23.7% | -15.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LCUT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.33x vs ACU's 11.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $159M | $1.04T | $57.4B | $163M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $188M | $1.09T | $57.5B | $402M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.80x | 47.69x | 15.49x | -5.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.10x | 44.71x | 15.74x | 14.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.11x | 4.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.92x | 24.85x | 7.26x | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 10.45x | 3.55x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.02x | 24.97x | 20.23x | 50.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-14 for LCUT. ACU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCUT's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACU scores 7/9 vs LCUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +22.3% | +26.1% | -14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.9% | +7.9% | +6.9% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +14.7% | +16.7% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +17.5% | +13.6% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29M | $56.4B | $104M | $239M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,596 | $10.7B | $5.5B | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $67.1B | $5.6B | $244M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.39x | 11.85x | 12.40x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,118 for LCUT. Over the past 12 months, LCUT leads with a +123.7% total return vs ACU's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs TGT's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | +15.7% | +26.4% | +87.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.1% | +32.7% | +36.6% | +123.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.8% | +160.5% | -11.0% | +52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | +186.9% | -31.6% | -48.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | +499.5% | +99.5% | -49.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +37.6% | -3.8% | +15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LCUT's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LCUT's 87.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.12x | 0.95x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.31 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $8.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.50 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $2.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 17.2M | 4.5M | 264K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACU as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", LCUT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.3% upside for WMT (target: $137) vs -30.5% for LCUT (target: $5). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 | $115.31 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 64 | 59 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +0.7% | +3.6% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 | 22 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $0.94 | $4.51 | $0.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
ACU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ACU vs WMT vs TGT vs LCUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acme United Corporation (ACU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Lifetime Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 4. 06x versus Acme United Corporation's 11. 31x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -48. 8% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus LCUT's -49. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Lifetime Brands, Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning LCUT is approximately 1237% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acme United Corporation (ACU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 120% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -5. 1% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for Lifetime Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT?
Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus -4. 2% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACU leads at 7. 5% versus 3. 8% for LCUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACU leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 06x versus Acme United Corporation's 11. 31x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) trades at 14. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 30. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 5. 3% to $137. 04.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Target Corporation (TGT) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is ACU or WMT or TGT or LCUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, LCUT: -49. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACU and WMT and TGT and LCUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACU (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and LCUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACU is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LCUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.