REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ADC vs WMT vs TGT vs KR vs DG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Grocery Stores
Discount Stores
ADC vs WMT vs TGT vs KR vs DG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Grocery Stores | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $9.17B | $1.04T | $57.36B | $42.03B | $25.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $750M | $703.06B | $106.25B | $147.64B | $42.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $220M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $1.02B | $1.51B |
| Gross Margin | 87.6% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 22.3% | 30.7% |
| Operating Margin | 48.0% | 4.1% | 5.3% | 1.3% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 38.9x | 44.7x | 15.7x | 12.7x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.35B | $67.09B | $5.59B | $24.68B | $15.72B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $10.73B | $5.49B | $3.33B | $1.14B |
ADC vs WMT vs TGT vs KR vs DG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.9 | +2.9% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| Dollar General Corp… (DG) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADC vs WMT vs TGT vs KR vs DG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth -0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
- 29.3% margin vs KR's 0.7%
- 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs ADC's 135.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Better valuation composite
TGT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +36.6% vs KR's -6.4%
KR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.43, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.6% vs KR's -6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.0% |
ADC vs WMT vs TGT vs KR vs DG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ADC vs WMT vs TGT vs KR vs DG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADC leads in 1 of 6 categories
TGT leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • KR leads 0 • DG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 937.4x ADC's $750M. ADC is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KR's 0.7%. On growth, ADC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $750M | $703.1B | $106.2B | $147.6B | $42.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $638M | $42.8B | $8.7B | $5.5B | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $220M | $22.9B | $4.0B | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $110M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $3.5B | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.6% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +22.3% | +30.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +1.3% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.3% | +3.3% | +3.8% | +0.7% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +2.4% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +1.2% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.0% | +35.1% | +23.7% | +50.0% | +121.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TGT and KR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.33x vs ADC's 113.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.2B | $1.04T | $57.4B | $42.0B | $25.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.5B | $1.09T | $57.5B | $63.4B | $40.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.12x | 47.69x | 15.49x | 43.12x | 17.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.94x | 44.71x | 15.74x | 12.68x | 16.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 113.70x | 4.33x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.30x | 24.85x | 7.26x | 10.91x | 12.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.76x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 0.28x | 0.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 10.45x | 3.55x | 7.33x | 3.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.18x | 24.97x | 20.23x | 12.55x | 10.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $4 for ADC. TGT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DG scores 7/9 vs KR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +22.3% | +26.1% | +13.0% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +7.9% | +6.9% | +2.0% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +14.7% | +16.7% | +5.0% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.8% | +17.5% | +13.6% | +5.5% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 4.16x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.3B | $56.4B | $104M | $21.3B | $14.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $10.7B | $5.5B | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $67.1B | $5.6B | $24.7B | $15.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.54x | 11.85x | 12.40x | 2.59x | 9.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,797 for DG. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +36.6% total return vs KR's -6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs DG's -17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.3% | +15.7% | +26.4% | +6.0% | -14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.3% | +32.7% | +36.6% | -6.4% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | +160.5% | -11.0% | +42.7% | -43.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.3% | +186.9% | -31.6% | +90.7% | -42.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.6% | +499.5% | +99.5% | +108.7% | +57.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | +37.6% | -3.8% | +12.6% | -17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs DG's 73.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | 0.12x | 0.95x | -0.64x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.08 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $76.58 | $158.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $58.60 | $86.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +86.7% | +73.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 39.2 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 17.2M | 4.5M | 5.6M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ADC and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADC as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", KR as "Buy", DG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.5% upside for DG (target: $145) vs -8.4% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, ADC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.50 | $137.04 | $115.31 | $74.75 | $145.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 64 | 59 | 44 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +0.7% | +3.6% | +2.0% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 37 | 22 | 21 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.06 | $0.94 | $4.51 | $1.35 | $2.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +6.4% | 0.0% |
ADC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TGT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ADC vs WMT vs TGT vs KR vs DG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 4. 06x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -42. 0% for Dollar General Corporation (DG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus DG's +57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Target Corporation's 0. 95β — meaning TGT is approximately -249% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Target Corporation (TGT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dollar General Corporation grew EPS 34. 1% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADC leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG?
Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the more profitable company, earning 28.
4% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADC leads at 47. 4% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 06x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co. (KR) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DG: 24. 5% to $145. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is ADC or WMT or TGT or KR or DG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, TGT: +99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADC and WMT and TGT and KR and DG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADC (Real Estate) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and KR (Consumer Defensive) and DG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.