Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ADEA vs VRNS vs AMZN vs CYBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
ADEA vs VRNS vs AMZN vs CYBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $3.27B | $3.35B | $2.93T | $20.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $460M | $660M | $742.78B | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $122M | $-137M | $90.80B | $-147M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 78.1% | 50.6% | 74.3% |
| Operating Margin | 46.3% | -21.9% | 11.5% | -7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 241.0x | 31.4x | 81.9x |
| Total Debt | $436M | $572M | $152.99B | $1.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $73M | $202M | $86.81B | $623M |
ADEA vs VRNS vs AMZN vs CYBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adeia Inc. (ADEA) | 100 | 811.3 | +711.3% |
| Varonis Systems, In… (VRNS) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| CyberArk Software L… (CYBR) | 100 | 415.1 | +315.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADEA vs VRNS vs AMZN vs CYBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (20.8x vs 81.9x)
- 26.5% margin vs VRNS's -20.7%
- 0.7% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +120.1% vs VRNS's -37.3%
VRNS plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CYBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.93
- Rev growth 36.0%, EPS growth -38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.0%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs ADEA's 324.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 50.9%, current ratio 2.00x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.0% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.8x vs 81.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.5% margin vs VRNS's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs ADEA's 1.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.1% vs VRNS's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.6% ROA vs VRNS's -8.2%, ROIC 19.0% vs -11.0% |
ADEA vs VRNS vs AMZN vs CYBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ADEA vs VRNS vs AMZN vs CYBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADEA leads in 4 of 6 categories
VRNS leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • CYBR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1613.0x ADEA's $460M. ADEA is the more profitable business, keeping 26.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRNS's -20.7%. On growth, VRNS holds the edge at +26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $460M | $660M | $742.8B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $274M | -$135M | $155.9B | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $122M | -$137M | $90.8B | -$147M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $156M | $120M | -$2.5B | $259M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +78.1% | +50.6% | +74.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +46.3% | -21.9% | +11.5% | -7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | -20.7% | +12.2% | -10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +18.1% | -0.3% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.5% | +26.9% | +16.6% | +18.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | 0.0% | +74.8% | +83.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ADEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, ADEA trades at a 22% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADEA's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CYBR's 908.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $3.4B | $2.93T | $20.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $3.7B | $3.00T | $21.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.83x | -25.25x | 38.03x | -139.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.79x | 240.96x | 31.41x | 81.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.57x | — | 20.58x | 908.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.37x | 5.37x | 4.09x | 15.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.94x | 6.16x | 7.18x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.89x | 24.86x | 381.09x | 79.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADEA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADEA delivers a 27.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-27 for VRNS. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRNS's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADEA scores 9/9 vs CYBR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.7% | -27.4% | +23.3% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.6% | -8.2% | +11.5% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.0% | -11.0% | +14.7% | -3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.1% | -14.0% | +15.3% | -3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.96x | 0.37x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $363M | $369M | $66.2B | $599M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $73M | $202M | $86.8B | $623M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $436M | $572M | $153.0B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.16x | -9.01x | 39.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADEA five years ago would be worth $56,747 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,284 for VRNS. Over the past 12 months, ADEA leads with a +120.1% total return vs VRNS's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADEA at 60.7% vs VRNS's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.3% | -11.0% | +20.4% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +120.1% | -37.3% | +42.0% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +315.0% | +23.0% | +157.7% | +194.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +467.5% | -37.2% | +70.9% | +241.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.7% | +315.3% | +702.2% | +901.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.7% | +7.2% | +37.1% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and CYBR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADEA's 1.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs VRNS's 44.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.97x | 0.94x | 1.50x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.34 | $63.90 | $278.56 | $526.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.61 | $19.70 | $188.82 | $347.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.0% | +44.6% | +97.9% | +77.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.3 | 70.0 | 74.2 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.3M | 45.2M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADEA as "Buy", VRNS as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", CYBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for VRNS (target: $36) vs 12.3% for CYBR (target: $459). ADEA is the only dividend payer here at 0.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.50 | $36.00 | $306.77 | $459.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 34 | 94 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.19 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +3.4% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
ADEA leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ADEA vs VRNS vs AMZN vs CYBR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger pick with 36. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Adeia Inc. (ADEA) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adeia Inc. (ADEA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR?
On trailing P/E, Adeia Inc.
(ADEA) is the cheapest at 29. 8x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Adeia Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR?
Over the past 5 years, Adeia Inc.
(ADEA) delivered a total return of +467. 5%, compared to -37. 2% for Varonis Systems, Inc. (VRNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYBR returned +901. 8% versus VRNS's +315. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Adeia Inc. 's 1. 97β — meaning ADEA is approximately 111% more volatile than CYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 96% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is pulling ahead at 36. 0% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adeia Inc. grew EPS 73. 7% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for CyberArk Software Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CYBR leads at 32. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR?
Adeia Inc.
(ADEA) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 1% net margin versus -20. 7% for Varonis Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADEA leads at 47. 2% versus -23. 5% for VRNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADEA leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Adeia Inc.
(ADEA) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 241. 0x for Varonis Systems, Inc. — 220. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VRNS: 26. 2% to $36. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR?
In this comparison, ADEA (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. VRNS, AMZN, CYBR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ADEA or VRNS or AMZN or CYBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CyberArk Software Ltd.
(CYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), +901. 8% 10Y return). Adeia Inc. (ADEA) carries a higher beta of 1. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYBR: +901. 8%, ADEA: +324. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADEA and VRNS and AMZN and CYBR?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADEA (Technology) and VRNS (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and CYBR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADEA is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CYBR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ADEA pays a dividend while VRNS, AMZN, CYBR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.