Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ADT vs CSGP vs ALLE vs Z vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Security & Protection Services
Internet Content & Information
Real Estate - Services
ADT vs CSGP vs ALLE vs Z vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Real Estate - Services | Security & Protection Services | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $5.18B | $14.83B | $11.76B | $10.57B | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.14B | $3.41B | $4.16B | $2.69B | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $623M | $25M | $634M | $61M | $-1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 77.4% | 45.0% | 73.3% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | -0.8% | 20.6% | 0.4% | -9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 25.8x | 15.6x | 19.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $7.69B | $1.14B | $2.28B | $536M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $81M | $1.73B | $356M | $773M | $962M |
ADT vs CSGP vs ALLE vs Z vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADT Inc. (ADT) | 100 | 86.3 | -13.7% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 49.2 | -50.8% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 133.8 | +33.8% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADT vs CSGP vs ALLE vs Z vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.7x)
- 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
CSGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
- 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
ALLE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 1.5%
- 127.3% 10Y total return vs CSGP's 77.5%
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.84x
- 15.2% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
Z is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs CSGP's -53.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 19.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs OPEN's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ALLE's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs CSGP's -53.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 18.1% vs -15.8% |
ADT vs CSGP vs ALLE vs Z vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ADT vs CSGP vs ALLE vs Z vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories
OPEN leads 1 • ADT leads 0 • CSGP leads 0 • Z leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ADT and CSGP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 1.9x Z's $2.7B. ALLE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.1B | $3.4B | $4.2B | $2.7B | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | $278M | $959M | $221M | -$363M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $623M | $25M | $634M | $61M | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $241M | $704M | $433M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | +77.4% | +45.0% | +73.3% | +7.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | -0.8% | +20.6% | +0.4% | -9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +0.7% | +15.2% | +2.3% | -35.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +7.1% | +16.9% | +16.1% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.9% | +22.5% | +9.7% | +18.4% | -37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.7% | +127.7% | -7.0% | +5.1% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADT and OPEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, ADT trades at a 100% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADT's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 83.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $14.8B | $11.8B | $10.6B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.8B | $14.2B | $13.7B | $10.3B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.28x | 2107.23x | 18.39x | 482.65x | -3.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.53x | 25.84x | 15.60x | 19.71x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.08x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.33x | 83.74x | 13.83x | 39.58x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 4.57x | 2.89x | 4.09x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 1.77x | 5.72x | 2.27x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.94x | 361.59x | 17.14x | 44.97x | 3.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLE delivers a 32.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADT scores 8/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.7% | +0.3% | +32.1% | +1.3% | -163.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +0.2% | +12.3% | +1.1% | -53.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | -0.9% | +18.1% | -0.5% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | -0.8% | +20.8% | -0.6% | -11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.03x | 0.14x | 1.10x | 0.11x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.6B | -$589M | $1.9B | -$237M | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $81M | $1.7B | $356M | $773M | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.7B | $1.1B | $2.3B | $536M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.23x | 1.58x | 8.61x | 5.22x | -8.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALLE five years ago would be worth $10,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs CSGP's -53.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs CSGP's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.3% | -46.7% | -14.6% | -33.7% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.1% | -53.6% | -1.0% | -35.7% | +510.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | -52.9% | +32.6% | -9.5% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.8% | -58.9% | +3.2% | -63.2% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.0% | +77.5% | +127.3% | +64.9% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | -22.2% | +9.9% | -3.3% | +37.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADT and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLE is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADT currently trades 77.1% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.80x | 0.67x | 1.32x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.94 | $97.43 | $183.11 | $93.88 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.25 | $33.31 | $131.25 | $39.05 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.1% | +35.9% | +74.7% | +46.5% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 30.4 | 38.5 | 51.1 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.7M | 5.9M | 887K | 3.6M | 36.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ADT and ALLE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADT as "Buy", CSGP as "Buy", ALLE as "Hold", Z as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 83.2% upside for Z (target: $80) vs 22.2% for OPEN (target: $7). For income investors, ADT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.03% vs ALLE's 1.48%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.97 | $61.91 | $172.50 | $80.00 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 25 | 23 | 46 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | — | +1.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 12 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.21 | — | $2.03 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.7% | +3.9% | +0.7% | +6.3% | 0.0% |
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
ADT vs CSGP vs ALLE vs Z vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). ADT Inc. (ADT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ADT Inc. (ADT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN?
On trailing P/E, ADT Inc.
(ADT) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, ADT Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, Allegion plc (ALLE) delivered a total return of +3.
2%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLE returned +127. 3% versus OPEN's -50. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allegion plc (ALLE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 364% more volatile than ALLE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 2% for ADT Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSGP leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADT leads at 26. 0% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ADT Inc.
(ADT) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for CoStar Group, Inc. — 18. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for Z: 83. 2% to $80. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN?
In this comparison, ADT (3.
0% yield), ALLE (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CSGP, Z, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ADT or CSGP or ALLE or Z or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 5% yield, +127. 3% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLE: +127. 3%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADT and CSGP and ALLE and Z and OPEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADT (Industrials) and CSGP (Real Estate) and ALLE (Industrials) and Z (Communication Services) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; Z is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ADT, ALLE pay a dividend while CSGP, Z, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.