Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ADUR vs GEVO vs LOOP vs AMTX vs HYLN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Auto - Parts
ADUR vs GEVO vs LOOP vs AMTX vs HYLN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $440M | $493M | $68M | $213M | $464M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $305K | $174M | $11M | $209M | $3M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-11M | $-3M | $-74M | $-57M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 23.4% | 96.3% | 3.4% | 4.9% |
| Operating Margin | -54.6% | -4.6% | -3.2% | -13.4% | -18.9% |
| Total Debt | $171K | $168M | $3M | $318M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $1M | $13M | $5M | $23M |
ADUR vs GEVO vs LOOP vs AMTX vs HYLN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aduro Clean Technol… (ADUR) | 100 | 292.4 | +192.4% |
| Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) | 100 | 87.1 | -12.9% |
| Loop Industries, In… (LOOP) | 100 | 106.8 | +6.8% |
| Aemetis, Inc. (AMTX) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
| Hyliion Holdings Co… (HYLN) | 100 | 103.3 | +3.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADUR vs GEVO vs LOOP vs AMTX vs HYLN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADUR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 193.7% 10Y total return vs AMTX's 31.1%
GEVO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 415.1%
- -6.6% margin vs ADUR's -63.4%
- -1.7% ROA vs ADUR's -88.2%, ROIC -2.8% vs -204.5%
LOOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.89
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, current ratio 3.50x
- Beta 0.89, current ratio 3.50x
- 70.2% revenue growth vs ADUR's -31.5%
AMTX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +140.0% vs LOOP's +42.4%
Among these 5 stocks, HYLN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.2% revenue growth vs ADUR's -31.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs ADUR's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs HYLN's 2.39 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +140.0% vs LOOP's +42.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs ADUR's -88.2%, ROIC -2.8% vs -204.5% |
ADUR vs GEVO vs LOOP vs AMTX vs HYLN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ADUR vs GEVO vs LOOP vs AMTX vs HYLN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOOP leads in 1 of 6 categories
GEVO leads 1 • ADUR leads 1 • AMTX leads 0 • HYLN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOOP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $209M annually — 685.8x ADUR's $305,275. GEVO is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADUR's -63.4%. On growth, ADUR holds the edge at +2.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $305,275 | $174M | $11M | $209M | $3M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $18M | $63,000 | -$21M | -$60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$11M | -$3M | -$74M | -$57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$35M | -$404,000 | -$38M | -$70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +23.4% | +96.3% | +3.4% | +4.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -54.6% | -4.6% | -3.2% | -13.4% | -18.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -63.4% | -6.6% | -24.3% | -35.4% | -16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.5% | -19.9% | -3.6% | -18.2% | -20.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +47.5% | +65.4% | +27.4% | -52.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.9% | +3.8% | +76.0% | +29.8% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADUR and GEVO and AMTX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $440M | $493M | $68M | $213M | $464M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $435M | $659M | $58M | $526M | $445M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -39.81x | -14.50x | -4.46x | -2.44x | -7.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 102.12x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2598.79x | 3.07x | 6.26x | 1.02x | 133.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 41.36x | 1.01x | 182.83x | — | 2.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEVO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEVO delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LOOP. ADUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOOP's 8.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEVO scores 4/9 vs ADUR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -112.3% | -2.4% | -2.1% | — | -29.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -88.2% | -1.7% | -24.0% | -29.3% | -28.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | -2.8% | -8.7% | -70.3% | -23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -126.3% | -3.1% | -35.0% | -19.0% | -29.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.36x | 8.41x | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $166M | -$10M | $313M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $1M | $13M | $5M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $170,953 | $168M | $3M | $318M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -944.89x | -0.04x | -0.69x | -0.27x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADUR five years ago would be worth $29,374 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,653 for LOOP. Over the past 12 months, AMTX leads with a +140.0% total return vs LOOP's +42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADUR at 43.2% vs LOOP's -23.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | -1.5% | +38.9% | +96.2% | +35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.4% | +88.0% | +42.4% | +140.0% | +52.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.7% | +65.0% | -55.2% | +37.4% | +40.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.7% | -65.2% | -83.5% | -76.1% | -72.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.7% | -98.6% | -90.8% | +31.1% | -74.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.2% | +18.2% | -23.5% | +11.2% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LOOP and HYLN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOOP is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HYLN's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HYLN currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs LOOP's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.64x | 0.89x | 1.46x | 2.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.66 | $2.97 | $2.29 | $3.80 | $2.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.40 | $1.01 | $0.85 | $1.22 | $1.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.3% | +68.4% | +61.6% | +82.1% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 53.5 | 55.6 | 58.2 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 4.5M | 74K | 1.8M | 949K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADUR as "Buy", GEVO as "Buy", AMTX as "Buy", HYLN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 72.4% upside for GEVO (target: $4) vs -43.9% for AMTX (target: $2).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $3.50 | — | $1.75 | $3.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 | — | 7 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LOOP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). GEVO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ADUR vs GEVO vs LOOP vs AMTX vs HYLN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADUR or GEVO or LOOP or AMTX or HYLN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is the stronger pick with 70. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 5% for Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. (ADUR). Analysts rate Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. (ADUR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ADUR or GEVO or LOOP or AMTX or HYLN?
Over the past 5 years, Aduro Clean Technologies Inc.
(ADUR) delivered a total return of +193. 7%, compared to -83. 5% for Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADUR returned +193. 7% versus GEVO's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ADUR or GEVO or LOOP or AMTX or HYLN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Hyliion Holdings Corp. 's 2. 39β — meaning HYLN is approximately 169% more volatile than LOOP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. (ADUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Loop Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ADUR or GEVO or LOOP or AMTX or HYLN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is pulling ahead at 70. 2% versus -31. 5% for Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. (ADUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gevo, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Aduro Clean Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEVO leads at 415. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ADUR or GEVO or LOOP or AMTX or HYLN?
Gevo, Inc.
(GEVO) is the more profitable company, earning -21. 1% net margin versus -52. 5% for Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps -21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEVO leads at -11. 7% versus -51. 2% for ADUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADUR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ADUR or GEVO or LOOP or AMTX or HYLN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ADUR or GEVO or LOOP or AMTX or HYLN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89)). Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOOP: -90. 8%, HYLN: -74. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ADUR and GEVO and LOOP and AMTX and HYLN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADUR (Basic Materials) and GEVO (Basic Materials) and LOOP (Basic Materials) and AMTX (Energy) and HYLN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEVO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LOOP is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYLN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.