Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AEHR vs ACLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
AEHR vs ACLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.96B | $5.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $839M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $120M |
| Gross Margin | 30.2% | 44.9% |
| Operating Margin | -27.8% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 43.5x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $145M |
AEHR vs ACLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) | 100 | 5530.9 | +5430.9% |
| Axcelis Technologie… (ACLS) | 100 | 590.9 | +490.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEHR vs ACLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AEHR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -20.2%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.1%
- 69.6% 10Y total return vs ACLS's 16.1%
- +10.8% vs ACLS's +212.7%
ACLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.00
- Lower volatility, beta 2.00, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 4.77x
- Beta 2.00, current ratio 4.77x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -17.6% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.3% margin vs AEHR's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.00 vs AEHR's 4.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.8% vs ACLS's +212.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs AEHR's -7.5%, ROIC 9.6% vs -3.0% |
AEHR vs ACLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AEHR vs ACLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $839M annually — 17.1x AEHR's $49M. ACLS is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEHR's -22.7%. On growth, ACLS holds the edge at -5.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $839M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $137M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $107M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +44.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.8% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.1% | +12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.5% | -5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ACLS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -744.08x | 45.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 43.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 50.23x | 6.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 23.29x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 51.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACLS leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACLS delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AEHR. ACLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEHR's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACLS scores 5/9 vs AEHR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.5% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.0% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $145M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEHR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEHR five years ago would be worth $429,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $42,463 for ACLS. Over the past 12 months, AEHR leads with a +1081.1% total return vs ACLS's +212.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEHR at 53.7% vs ACLS's 12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +336.5% | +98.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1081.1% | +212.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +262.8% | +42.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4199.1% | +324.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6960.6% | +1610.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.7% | +12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ACLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACLS is the less volatile stock with a 2.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEHR's 4.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLS currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs AEHR's 94.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.77x | 2.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.48 | $171.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.02 | $52.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.4% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 71.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 717K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AEHR as "Hold" and ACLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -25.1% upside for ACLS (target: $128) vs -35.9% for AEHR (target: $62).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.00 | $128.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.2% |
ACLS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEHR leads in 1 (Total Returns).
AEHR vs ACLS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEHR or ACLS a better buy right now?
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) offers the better valuation at 45. 0x trailing P/E (43. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AEHR or ACLS?
Over the past 5 years, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) delivered a total return of +42.
0%, compared to +324. 6% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEHR returned +70. 3% versus ACLS's +1506%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AEHR or ACLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 00β versus Aehr Test Systems's 4. 77β — meaning AEHR is approximately 139% more volatile than ACLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 9% for Aehr Test Systems — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AEHR or ACLS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aehr Test Systems grew EPS 0.
0% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEHR leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AEHR or ACLS?
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus -6. 6% for Aehr Test Systems — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACLS leads at 14. 2% versus -7. 3% for AEHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLS leads at 44. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AEHR or ACLS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACLS: -25.
1% to $128. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AEHR or ACLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AEHR or ACLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
(ACLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1506% 10Y return). Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) carries a higher beta of 4. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLS: +1506%, AEHR: +70. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AEHR and ACLS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.