AENT vs GME

For growth investors, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is the stronger pick with -3.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for GameStop Corp. (GME). Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GameStop Corp. (GME) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is the cheapest at 24.

4x versus GameStop Corp. at 31. 1x. On forward P/E, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) delivered a total return of -25.

1%, compared to -40. 5% for GameStop Corp. (GME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GME returned +232. 2% versus AENT's -25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

90β versus GameStop Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning GME is approximately 4% more volatile than AENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GameStop Corp. (GME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 88% for Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is pulling ahead at -3.

4% versus -5. 1% for GameStop Corp. (GME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation grew EPS 233. 0% year-over-year, compared to 133. 3% for GameStop Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AENT leads at -9. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

GameStop Corp.

(GME) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 1. 4% for Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GME leads at 6. 4% versus 2. 8% for AENT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GME leads at 33. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) trades at 20.

3x forward P/E versus 24. 2x for GameStop Corp. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AENT: 9. 4% to $8. 00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, GameStop Corp.

(GME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), +232. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GME: +232. 2%, AENT: -25. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AENT (Communication Services) and GME (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.