Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AEO vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
AEO vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $4.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.50B | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $192M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.73B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $239M | $748M |
AEO vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 184.6 | +84.6% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 202.0 | +102.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEO vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AEO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.08
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -35.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 48.9% 10Y total return vs PVH's 1.9%
PVH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 66.0%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 1.48, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 12.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.2% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 12.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs AEO's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs AEO's 2.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs PVH's +29.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs PVH's 4.0%, ROIC 8.1% vs 7.0% |
AEO vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AEO vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 1.6x AEO's $5.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.3% (PVH) to 3.5% (AEO). On growth, AEO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.5B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $546M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $192M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 44% valuation discount to AEO's 15.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PVH's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AEO's 8.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $6.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.51x | 8.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.26x | 8.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.08x | 6.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEO delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $10 for PVH. PVH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEO's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PVH scores 7/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.7% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $239M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 75.18x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PVH five years ago would be worth $7,993 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,351 for AEO. Over the past 12 months, AEO leads with a +57.8% total return vs PVH's +29.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEO at 10.9% vs PVH's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.9% | +35.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.8% | +29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.4% | +11.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | -20.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.9% | +1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PVH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PVH is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PVH currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs AEO's 59.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.46 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.27 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.4% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
AEO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AEO as "Hold" and PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.8% upside for AEO (target: $25) vs 8.8% for PVH (target: $100). PVH is the only dividend payer here at 0.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.83 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.5% |
PVH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEO leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
AEO vs PVH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEO or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
(AEO) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PVH Corp. (PVH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEO or PVH?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. at 15. 5x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEO or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, PVH Corp.
(PVH) delivered a total return of -20. 1%, compared to -46. 5% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEO returned +48. 9% versus PVH's +1. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEO or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning AEO is approximately 41% more volatile than PVH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PVH Corp. (PVH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 102% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEO or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
(AEO) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PVH Corp. grew EPS -1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -35. 1% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEO leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEO or PVH?
PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus 3. 5% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PVH leads at 8. 5% versus 6. 0% for AEO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVH leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEO or PVH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp.
(PVH) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AEO: 46. 8% to $24. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEO or PVH?
In this comparison, PVH (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AEO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AEO or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PVH: +1. 9%, AEO: +48. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEO and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.