Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AEON logo
AEON
REVB logo
REVB
CRL logo
CRL
MEDP logo
MEDP
ICLR logo
ICLR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AEON vs REVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AEON
AEON Biopharma, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
REVB
Revelation Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.03B
5Y Perf.-10.5%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.35B
5Y Perf.+84.6%
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$11.19B
5Y Perf.-41.9%

AEON vs REVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AEON logoAEON
REVB logoREVB
CRL logoCRL
MEDP logoMEDP
ICLR logoICLR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$9M$3M$9.03B$13.35B$11.19B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$4.03B$2.68B$8.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-60M$-10M$-185M$460M$489M
Gross Margin31.9%29.1%25.2%
Operating Margin11.8%21.0%11.0%
Forward P/E16.9x27.5x13.9x
Total Debt$36M$747K$3.07B$250M$3.56B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$11M$214M$497M$647M

AEON vs REVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AEON
REVB
CRL
MEDP
ICLR
StockJul 23Jun 26Return
AEON Biopharma, Inc. (AEON)1000.1-99.9%
Revelation Bioscien… (REVB)1000.0-100.0%
Charles River Labor… (CRL)10089.5-10.5%
Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP)100184.6+84.6%
ICON Public Limited… (ICLR)10058.1-41.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AEON vs REVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MEDP leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AEON Biopharma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. ICLR also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇MEDP emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
AEON
AEON Biopharma, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

AEON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.

  • Beta 0.11 vs ICLR's 1.59
Best for: stability
REVB
Revelation Biosciences, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

REVB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 8.4%, current ratio 5.41x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
The Income Pick

CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.39
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 1.29x
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
  • 15.8% 10Y total return vs CRL's 122.4%
  • 20.0% revenue growth vs AEON's -135.5%
  • 17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ICLR
ICON Public Limited Company
The Value Play

ICLR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (13.9x vs 27.5x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMEDP logoMEDP20.0% revenue growth vs AEON's -135.5%
ValueICLR logoICLRLower P/E (13.9x vs 27.5x)
Quality / MarginsMEDP logoMEDP17.2% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
Stability / SafetyAEON logoAEONBeta 0.11 vs ICLR's 1.59
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MEDP logoMEDP+53.7% vs REVB's -89.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MEDP logoMEDP24.8% ROA vs AEON's -7.0%

AEON vs REVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AEONAEON Biopharma, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

REVBRevelation Biosciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRLCharles River Laboratories International, Inc.
FY 2025
Discovery and Safety Assessment
59.8%$2.4B
Research Models and Services
21.1%$846M
Manufacturing Support
19.1%$766M
MEDPMedpace Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Oncology
29.5%$748M
Metabolic
29.4%$745M
Other
16.1%$409M
Central Nervous System
10.1%$255M
Cardiology
9.5%$239M
Antiviral And Anti Infective
5.3%$135M
ICLRICON Public Limited Company
FY 2012
Clinical Research
92.2%$1.0B
Central Laboratory
7.8%$87M

AEON vs REVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMEDPLAGGINGREVB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ICLR and REVB operate at a comparable scale, with $8.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…REVB logoREVBRevelation Biosci…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$4.0B$2.7B$8.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$18M-$10M$824M$577M$1.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$60M-$10M-$185M$460M$489M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$12M-$9M$391M$745M$1.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.9%+29.1%+25.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.8%+21.0%+11.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.6%+17.2%+6.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.7%+27.8%+16.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.2%+26.5%+3.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-142.5%-28.4%-160.0%+16.6%-38.9%
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 30.6x trailing earnings, MEDP trades at a 39% valuation discount to ICLR's 50.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ICLR's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEDP's 23.3x.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…REVB logoREVBRevelation Biosci…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
Market CapShares × price$9M$3M$9.0B$13.3B$11.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$41M-$7M$11.9B$13.1B$14.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.18x-0.04x-64.44x30.59x50.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.90x27.51x13.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.96x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.04x23.27x10.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.25x5.27x1.36x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.07x2.89x30.06x1.26x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.42x19.57x12.98x
ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-108 for REVB. REVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs AEON's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…REVB logoREVBRevelation Biosci…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-107.7%-5.7%+120.9%+5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.0%-88.0%-2.5%+24.8%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%+154.9%+6.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-126.9%+8.1%+65.7%+7.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924465
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.95x0.55x0.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$33M-$10M$2.9B-$247M$2.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$11M$214M$497M$647M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$36M$746,784$3.1B$250M$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.29x3.83x
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $26,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for REVB. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +53.7% total return vs REVB's -89.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 28.9% vs REVB's -94.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…REVB logoREVBRevelation Biosci…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-34.2%-69.3%-7.4%-18.2%-22.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.1%-89.7%+23.5%+53.7%-0.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-100.0%-8.7%+114.4%-35.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-100.0%-47.2%+160.4%-32.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-100.0%+122.4%+1581.7%+120.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.7%-94.6%-3.0%+28.9%-13.8%
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AEON and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AEON is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 81.9% from its 52-week high vs REVB's 7.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…REVB logoREVBRevelation Biosci…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.11x1.44x1.39x1.04x1.59x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.45$12.88$228.88$628.92$211.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.63$0.60$143.06$294.07$66.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.4%+7.7%+81.9%+74.3%+69.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.741.860.866.267.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded85K62K767K365K1.2M
Evenly matched — AEON and CRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CRL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CRL as "Buy", MEDP as "Hold", ICLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for CRL (target: $213) vs -0.6% for ICLR (target: $145).

MetricAEON logoAEONAEON Biopharma, I…REVB logoREVBRevelation Biosci…CRL logoCRLCharles River Lab…MEDP logoMEDPMedpace Holdings,…ICLR logoICLRICON Public Limit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$213.17$498.86$145.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts371930
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.0%+6.9%+6.7%
CRL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MEDP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMedpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AEON vs REVB vs CRL vs MEDP vs ICLR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) offers the better valuation at 30. 6x trailing P/E (27. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?

On trailing P/E, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the cheapest at 30. 6x versus ICON Public Limited Company at 50. 4x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 13. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?

Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Revelation Biosciences, Inc. (REVB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1582% versus REVB's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AEON Biopharma, Inc.

(AEON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 59β — meaning ICLR is approximately 1411% more volatile than AEON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Revelation Biosciences, Inc. (REVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Revelation Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS 72. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?

Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus 0. 0% for REVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRL leads at 30. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 13.

9x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRL: 13. 7% to $213. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AEON or REVB or CRL or MEDP or ICLR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.

(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1582% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1582%, REVB: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AEON and REVB and CRL and MEDP and ICLR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AEON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REVB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ICLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.