AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$860M
5Y Perf.-81.5%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AEVA vs OUST vs INVZ vs LAZR vs LIDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.-79.1%
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$117M
5Y Perf.-94.7%
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
LIDR
AEye, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
AEVA vs OUST vs INVZ vs LAZR vs LIDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AEVA | OUST | INVZ | LAZR | LIDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $860M | $1.56B | $117M | $2M | $85M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $185M | $55M | $76M | $233K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-146M | $-56M | $-68M | $-234M | $-34M |
| Gross Margin | 4.6% | 49.0% | 23.4% | -21.3% | -137.8% |
| Operating Margin | -6.3% | -37.4% | -123.0% | -332.8% | -136.2% |
| Total Debt | $102M | $17M | $65M | $535M | $235K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $67M | $9M | $83M | $43M |
AEVA vs OUST vs INVZ vs LAZR vs LIDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AEVA
OUST
INVZ
LAZR
LIDR
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aeva Technologies, … (AEVA) | 100 | 18.5 | -81.5% |
| Ouster, Inc. (OUST) | 100 | 20.9 | -79.1% |
| Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| AEye, Inc. (LIDR) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEVA vs OUST vs INVZ vs LAZR vs LIDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OUST leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Innoviz Technologies Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. LIDR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AEVA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 172.4% 10Y total return vs OUST's -74.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
The Quality Compounder
OUST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- -30.1% margin vs LIDR's -145.7%
- +196.7% vs LAZR's -98.4%
- -15.9% ROA vs AEVA's -113.9%, ROIC -30.2% vs -162.8%
Best for: quality and momentum
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
The Growth Play
INVZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
- 127.0% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0%
Best for: growth exposure
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick
Among these 5 stocks, LAZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
LIDR
AEye, Inc.
The Income Pick
LIDR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.22
- Lower volatility, beta 2.22, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 10.46x
- Beta 2.22, current ratio 10.46x
- Beta 2.22 vs AEVA's 3.75, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | INVZ | 127.0% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0% |
| Quality / Margins | OUST | -30.1% margin vs LIDR's -145.7% |
| Stability / Safety | LIDR | Beta 2.22 vs AEVA's 3.75, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OUST | +196.7% vs LAZR's -98.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OUST | -15.9% ROA vs AEVA's -113.9%, ROIC -30.2% vs -162.8% |
AEVA vs OUST vs INVZ vs LAZR vs LIDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FY 2024
AEVA vs OUST vs INVZ vs LAZR vs LIDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOUSTLAGGINGLIDR
Who Leads Where
OUST leads in 2 of 6 categories
AEVA leads 0 • INVZ leads 0 • LAZR leads 0 • LIDR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓LIDRAEye, Inc.
0leads
LAZRLuminar Technologies,…
0leads
INVZInnoviz Technologies …
0leads
AEVAAeva Technologies, In…
0leads
OUSTOuster, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AEVAvs INVZMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OUST5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OUST6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OUST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OUST is the larger business by revenue, generating $185M annually — 795.4x LIDR's $233,000. OUST is the more profitable business, keeping -30.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIDR's -145.7%. On growth, LIDR holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AEVAAeva Technologies… | OUSTOuster, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | LIDRAEye, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $185M | $55M | $76M | $233,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$123M | -$60M | -$62M | -$229M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$146M | -$56M | -$68M | -$234M | -$34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | -$69M | -$52M | -$209M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +49.0% | +23.4% | -21.3% | -137.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | -37.4% | -123.0% | -3.3% | -136.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | -30.1% | -123.1% | -3.1% | -145.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | -37.4% | -94.4% | -2.8% | -86.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.9% | +48.9% | +110.3% | +21.0% | +110.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +33.3% | +9.1% | -2.6% | -41.7% |
OUST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OUST and INVZ and LAZR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AEVAAeva Technologies… | OUSTOuster, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | LIDRAEye, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $860M | $1.6B | $117M | $2M | $85M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $890M | $1.5B | $173M | $454M | $42M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.36x | -22.91x | -2.04x | -0.01x | -1.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 47.56x | 9.21x | 2.13x | 0.03x | 365.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 58.94x | 5.28x | 1.78x | — | 5.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Evenly matched — OUST and INVZ and LAZR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OUST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OUST delivers a -22.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-22 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AEVA. LIDR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEVA's 7.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OUST scores 6/9 vs LAZR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AEVAAeva Technologies… | OUSTOuster, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | LIDRAEye, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -22.2% | -87.2% | — | -72.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -113.9% | -15.9% | -49.0% | -81.0% | -59.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -162.8% | -30.2% | -46.9% | -123.6% | -100.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -101.2% | -31.1% | -64.1% | -118.7% | -64.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.75x | 0.07x | 0.83x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | -$50M | $56M | $452M | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $67M | $9M | $83M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $17M | $65M | $535M | $235,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.40x | — | -39.12x | -3.73x | -9.65x |
OUST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AEVA and OUST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEVA five years ago would be worth $2,906 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +196.7% total return vs LAZR's -98.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 76.5% vs LAZR's -91.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AEVAAeva Technologies… | OUSTOuster, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | LIDRAEye, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +4.9% | -28.1% | -24.1% | -10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.6% | +196.7% | -3.9% | -98.4% | +191.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.9% | +449.6% | -72.8% | -99.9% | -70.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.9% | -76.1% | -93.0% | -100.0% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17235.0% | -74.7% | -92.9% | -100.0% | -99.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.8% | +76.5% | -35.2% | -91.4% | -33.0% |
Evenly matched — AEVA and OUST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OUST and LIDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIDR is the less volatile stock with a 2.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEVA's 3.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OUST currently trades 58.8% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AEVAAeva Technologies… | OUSTOuster, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | LIDRAEye, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.75x | 3.51x | 2.69x | 2.40x | 2.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.80 | $41.65 | $2.54 | $4.82 | $6.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.53 | $8.08 | $0.58 | $0.05 | $0.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.2% | +58.8% | +27.3% | +1.3% | +29.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 67.9 | 59.9 | 36.2 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.3M | 2.4M | 418K | 5.0M |
Evenly matched — OUST and LIDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AEVA as "Buy", OUST as "Buy", INVZ as "Buy", LIDR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 534.9% upside for LIDR (target: $12) vs 46.4% for AEVA (target: $20).
| Metric | AEVAAeva Technologies… | OUSTOuster, Inc. | INVZInnoviz Technolog… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | LIDRAEye, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $37.00 | $2.00 | — | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 9 | 5 | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
OUST leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallOuster, Inc. (OUST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AEVA vs OUST vs INVZ vs LAZR vs LIDR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEVA or OUST or INVZ or LAZR or LIDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger pick with 127. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Analysts rate Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AEVA or OUST or INVZ or LAZR or LIDR?
Over the past 5 years, Aeva Technologies, Inc.
(AEVA) delivered a total return of -70. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEVA returned +172. 4% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AEVA or OUST or INVZ or LAZR or LIDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AEye, Inc.
(LIDR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 22β versus Aeva Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 75β — meaning AEVA is approximately 69% more volatile than LIDR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AEye, Inc. (LIDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for Aeva Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AEVA or OUST or INVZ or LAZR or LIDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is pulling ahead at 127. 0% versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Luminar Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 60. 5% year-over-year, compared to -226. 7% for AEye, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVZ leads at 109. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AEVA or OUST or INVZ or LAZR or LIDR?
Ouster, Inc.
(OUST) is the more profitable company, earning -35. 6% net margin versus -145. 7% for AEye, Inc. — meaning it keeps -35. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OUST leads at -43. 7% versus -136. 2% for LIDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OUST leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AEVA or OUST or INVZ or LAZR or LIDR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AEVA or OUST or INVZ or LAZR or LIDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aeva Technologies, Inc.
(AEVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+172. 4% 10Y return). Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEVA: +172. 4%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AEVA and OUST and INVZ and LAZR and LIDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (AEVA (Consumer Cyclical) and OUST (Technology) and INVZ (Consumer Cyclical) and LAZR (Consumer Cyclical) and LIDR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AEVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock; INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIDR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AEVA: 85.9% · OUST: 48.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.