Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AFJK vs ACMR vs ICHR vs CANG vs MKSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AFJK
Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$261M
5Y Perf.+319.2%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+247.6%
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.+105.6%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.+9.7%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+194.2%

AFJK vs ACMR vs ICHR vs CANG vs MKSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AFJK logoAFJK
ACMR logoACMR
ICHR logoICHR
CANG logoCANG
MKSI logoMKSI
IndustryShell CompaniesSemiconductorsSemiconductorsAuto - DealershipsHardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$261M$3.92B$2.47B$250M$20.25B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$901M$959M$3.46B$4.07B
Net Income (TTM)$1M$94M$-51M$-178M$327M
Gross Margin44.4%11.3%13.6%45.2%
Operating Margin12.1%-3.8%7.3%14.8%
Forward P/E251.0x30.8x62.2x5.7x27.3x
Total Debt$2M$303M$186M$170M$4.69B
Cash & Equiv.$3K$766M$98M$1.29B$675M

AFJK vs ACMR vs ICHR vs CANG vs MKSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AFJK
ACMR
ICHR
CANG
MKSI
StockJan 24May 26Return
Aimei Health Techno… (AFJK)100419.2+319.2%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100347.6+247.6%
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR)100205.6+105.6%
Cango Inc. (CANG)100109.7+9.7%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100294.2+194.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AFJK vs ACMR vs ICHR vs CANG vs MKSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. ICHR, CANG, and MKSI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AFJK
Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd
The Banking Pick

AFJK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.

  • Beta 0.23 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
Best for: stability
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Growth Play

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs AFJK's -57.2%
  • 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

ICHR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +329.1% vs CANG's -73.7%
Best for: momentum
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.25, Low D/E 4.1%, current ratio 1.88x
  • Lower P/E (5.7x vs 27.3x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick

MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
  • Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
  • 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACMR logoACMR15.2% revenue growth vs AFJK's -57.2%
ValueCANG logoCANGLower P/E (5.7x vs 27.3x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Stability / SafetyAFJK logoAFJKBeta 0.23 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ICHR logoICHR+329.1% vs CANG's -73.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ACMR logoACMR3.9% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2%, ROIC 7.0% vs -3.9%

AFJK vs ACMR vs ICHR vs CANG vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AFJKAimei Health Technology Co., Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M

AFJK vs ACMR vs ICHR vs CANG vs MKSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGICHR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI and AFJK operate at a comparable scale, with $4.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$901M$959M$3.5B$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$835,759$126M-$11M$333M$945M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M$94M-$51M-$178M$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$565,100-$69M-$17M$0$401M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.4%+11.3%+13.6%+45.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.1%-3.8%+7.3%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.4%-5.3%-5.2%+8.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.6%-1.7%-154.0%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.4%+4.7%+58.3%+15.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-59.1%-76.1%+46.2%+3.6%+53.2%
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 98% valuation discount to AFJK's 251.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Market CapShares × price$261M$3.9B$2.5B$250M$20.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$263M$3.5B$2.6B$85M$24.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS251.03x43.21x-46.25x5.66x68.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.81x62.25x27.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.49x3.13x26.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.35x2.61x2.12x5.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share21.48x2.06x3.67x0.42x7.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.74x
CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+6.1%-7.5%-4.1%+12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.9%+3.9%-5.2%-2.3%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.5%+7.0%-3.9%+4.6%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.0%+6.6%-4.7%+4.5%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922346
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.16x0.28x0.04x1.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M-$463M$87M-$1.1B$4.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2,929$766M$98M$1.3B$675M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$303M$186M$170M$4.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense20.44x-5.97x-1.87x2.84x
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AFJK five years ago would be worth $42,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,579 for CANG. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs CANG's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.7%+31.9%+249.0%-62.0%+78.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+288.0%+195.6%+329.1%-73.7%+306.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%+487.9%+151.1%+1.2%+266.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%+133.4%+28.9%-14.2%+66.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%+3065.8%+629.1%-44.9%+750.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.4%+80.5%+35.9%+0.4%+54.1%
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AFJK and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AFJK is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.32x3.17x3.78x2.49x2.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$130.37$71.65$72.87$2.88$326.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.75$19.26$13.12$0.33$71.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.7%+82.6%+97.7%+18.6%+92.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.260.766.958.665.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded21K1.2M795K1.3M1.2M
Evenly matched — AFJK and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CANG and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs -30.1% for ICHR (target: $50). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…CANG logoCANGCango Inc.MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$75.00$49.80$3.00$294.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts1014229
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3150
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%0.0%+5.3%+0.2%
Evenly matched — CANG and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MKSI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CANG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AFJK vs ACMR vs ICHR vs CANG vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Aimei Health Technology Co. , Ltd at 251. 0x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI?

Over the past 5 years, Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) delivered a total return of +320. 4%, compared to -14. 2% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus CANG's -43. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 78β — meaning ICHR is approximately 1077% more volatile than AFJK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) trades at 27. 3x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 35. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AFJK, ICHR, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AFJK or ACMR or ICHR or CANG or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +320. 4% 10Y return). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AFJK: +320. 4%, CANG: -43. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AFJK and ACMR and ICHR and CANG and MKSI?

These companies operate in different sectors (AFJK (Financial Services) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AFJK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AFJK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AFJK and ACMR and ICHR and CANG and MKSI on the metrics below

P/E Ratio<
x
(AFJK: 251.0x · ACMR: 43.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.