Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AGCO vs CNH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
AGCO vs CNH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $8.29B | $12.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.37B | $18.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $771M | $386M |
| Gross Margin | 24.9% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.8x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.69B | $27.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $862M | $3.23B |
AGCO vs CNH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 207.4 | +107.4% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 167.8 | +67.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGCO vs CNH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth -13.5%, EPS growth 271.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.3%
- 173.0% 10Y total return vs CNH's 72.4%
CNH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.15, yield 2.6%, current ratio 7.75x
- -8.8% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5%
- 2.6% yield, vs AGCO's 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -8.8% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 24.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs CNH's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs CNH's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, vs AGCO's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.7% vs CNH's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 8.3% vs 6.6% |
AGCO vs CNH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AGCO vs CNH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AGCO and CNH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNH is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.1B annually — 1.7x AGCO's $10.4B. AGCO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNH's 2.1%. On growth, AGCO holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.4B | $18.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $963M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $771M | $386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $546M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +31.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | -0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | -94.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AGCO and CNH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, AGCO trades at a 53% valuation discount to CNH's 25.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGCO's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNH's 10.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.3B | $12.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.1B | $36.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.75x | 25.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.82x | 24.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.86x | 10.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.20x | 6.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNH. AGCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGCO scores 8/9 vs CNH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.7% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 3.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $23.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $862M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.36x | 1.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGCO five years ago would be worth $8,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,500 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, AGCO leads with a +20.7% total return vs CNH's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGCO at -0.4% vs CNH's -8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.7% | -14.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.2% | -22.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.7% | -25.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.0% | +72.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | -8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AGCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNH's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGCO currently trades 79.7% from its 52-week high vs CNH's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $143.78 | $14.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $93.30 | $9.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 689K | 15.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CNH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AGCO as "Buy" and CNH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for CNH (target: $13) vs 11.1% for AGCO (target: $127). For income investors, CNH offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs AGCO's 1.01%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $127.29 | $13.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.16 | $0.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% |
AGCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CNH leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AGCO vs CNH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGCO or CNH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is the stronger pick with -8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AGCO Corporation (AGCO) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGCO or CNH?
On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus CNH Industrial N. V. at 25. 2x. On forward P/E, AGCO Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGCO or CNH?
Over the past 5 years, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) delivered a total return of -10.
7%, compared to -25. 0% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGCO returned +173. 0% versus CNH's +72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGCO or CNH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus CNH Industrial N. V. 's 1. 15β — meaning CNH is approximately 5% more volatile than AGCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGCO or CNH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CNH Industrial N.
V. (CNH) is pulling ahead at -8. 8% versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGCO leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGCO or CNH?
AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
2% net margin versus 2. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNH leads at 15. 4% versus 6. 9% for AGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNH leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGCO or CNH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) trades at 19.
8x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for CNH Industrial N. V. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNH: 28. 4% to $13. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGCO or CNH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 0% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO).
09Is AGCO or CNH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 1. 0% yield, +173. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGCO: +173. 0%, CNH: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGCO and CNH?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.