AGCO vs LNN

For growth investors, Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is the stronger pick with 11.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AGCO Corporation (AGCO) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 11.

7x versus Lindsay Corporation at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, AGCO Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lindsay Corporation wins at 1. 58x versus AGCO Corporation's 1. 72x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) delivered a total return of -10.

7%, compared to -29. 8% for Lindsay Corporation (LNN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGCO returned +173. 0% versus LNN's +74. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

60β versus AGCO Corporation's 1. 10β — meaning AGCO is approximately 84% more volatile than LNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lindsay Corporation (LNN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 59% for AGCO Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is pulling ahead at 11.

4% versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Lindsay Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNN leads at -4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

9% net margin versus 7. 2% for AGCO Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNN leads at 13. 0% versus 6. 9% for AGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNN leads at 31. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 58x versus AGCO Corporation's 1. 72x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Lindsay Corporation — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNN: 16. 7% to $128. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Lindsay Corporation (LNN) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 1. 0% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

60), 1. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNN: +74. 3%, AGCO: +173. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.