AGI vs IAG

For growth investors, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the stronger pick with 77.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 34. 6% for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the cheapest at 14.

0x versus Alamos Gold Inc. at 18. 5x. On forward P/E, IAMGOLD Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IAMGOLD Corporation wins at 0. 10x versus Alamos Gold Inc. 's 0. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) delivered a total return of +416.

7%, compared to +370. 1% for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGI returned +503. 3% versus IAG's +385. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alamos Gold Inc.

(AGI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus IAMGOLD Corporation's 0. 93β — meaning IAG is approximately 56% more volatile than AGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 20% for IAMGOLD Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is pulling ahead at 77.

8% versus 34. 6% for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alamos Gold Inc. grew EPS 204. 3% year-over-year, compared to -22. 7% for IAMGOLD Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IAG leads at 44. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Alamos Gold Inc.

(AGI) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 1% net margin versus 23. 3% for IAMGOLD Corporation — meaning it keeps 49. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGI leads at 44. 5% versus 38. 9% for IAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGI leads at 54. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 10x versus Alamos Gold Inc. 's 0. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Alamos Gold Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAG: 81. 3% to $29. 50.

In this comparison, AGI (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. IAG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alamos Gold Inc.

(AGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +503. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGI: +503. 3%, IAG: +385. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.