Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRI vs HAYW vs DRS vs KTOS vs VSEC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
AIRI vs HAYW vs DRS vs KTOS vs VSEC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $15M | $3.20B | $11.05B | $10.68B | $4.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $1.15B | $3.69B | $1.42B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $161M | $290M | $29M | $63M |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 45.0% | 24.2% | 18.3% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 21.3% | 9.9% | 1.8% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.2x | 33.0x | 73.5x | 47.9x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $13M | $470M | $180M | $343M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $753K | $330M | $647M | $561M | $69M |
AIRI vs HAYW vs DRS vs KTOS vs VSEC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air Industries Group (AIRI) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
| Hayward Holdings, I… (HAYW) | 100 | 87.5 | -12.5% |
| Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) | 100 | 345.0 | +245.0% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 208.9 | +108.9% |
| VSE Corporation (VSEC) | 100 | 504.9 | +404.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRI vs HAYW vs DRS vs KTOS vs VSEC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRI is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.91 vs VSEC's 1.93
HAYW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 2.94x
- PEG 0.12 vs DRS's 2.63
- Lower P/E (17.2x vs 47.9x)
- 14.0% margin vs AIRI's -4.0%
DRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 0.9%
- 54.1% 10Y total return vs VSEC's 5.2%
- Beta 0.95, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.89x
- 0.9% yield, vs VSEC's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
KTOS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs VSEC's 3.0%
- +58.1% vs AIRI's -14.2%
Among these 5 stocks, VSEC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs VSEC's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.2x vs 47.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.0% margin vs AIRI's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs VSEC's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, vs VSEC's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs AIRI's -14.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs AIRI's -0.0%, ROIC 10.5% vs 0.8% |
AIRI vs HAYW vs DRS vs KTOS vs VSEC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AIRI vs HAYW vs DRS vs KTOS vs VSEC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HAYW leads in 2 of 6 categories
DRS leads 1 • KTOS leads 1 • AIRI leads 0 • VSEC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 73.9x AIRI's $50M. HAYW is the more profitable business, keeping 14.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIRI's -4.0%. On growth, VSEC holds the edge at +26.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $1.1B | $3.7B | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $301M | $436M | $72M | $170M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $161M | $290M | $29M | $63M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $80M | $397M | -$133M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +45.0% | +24.2% | +18.3% | +12.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +21.3% | +9.9% | +1.8% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +14.0% | +7.8% | +2.1% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +7.0% | +10.7% | -9.4% | -1.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.9% | +11.5% | +5.9% | +22.6% | +26.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.2% | +70.3% | +21.1% | +133.3% | +3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HAYW leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, HAYW trades at a 95% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAYW offers better value at 0.16x vs DRS's 3.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $3.2B | $11.1B | $10.7B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42M | $2.9B | $10.9B | $10.3B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.51x | 21.71x | 40.23x | 438.46x | 79.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.19x | 33.01x | 73.49x | 47.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x | 3.20x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.36x | 9.81x | 24.67x | 118.42x | 29.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 2.85x | 3.03x | 7.93x | 4.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 2.06x | 4.08x | 4.94x | 2.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.19x | 48.70x | — | 798.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-0 for AIRI. HAYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIRI's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAYW scores 7/9 vs KTOS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | +10.3% | +10.8% | +1.3% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +5.2% | +6.8% | +1.0% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +10.2% | +10.5% | +1.4% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | +8.6% | +10.8% | +1.5% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.86x | 0.01x | 0.17x | 0.09x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | -$316M | -$177M | -$381M | $273M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $753,000 | $330M | $647M | $561M | $69M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $13M | $470M | $180M | $343M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.10x | 4.07x | 40.86x | 6.16x | 8.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTOS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VSEC five years ago would be worth $45,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,316 for AIRI. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +58.1% total return vs AIRI's -14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs AIRI's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.0% | -6.4% | +19.4% | -28.1% | +10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.2% | +7.3% | +0.6% | +58.1% | +57.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.9% | +27.3% | +165.6% | +331.5% | +317.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | -37.0% | +231.9% | +110.3% | +358.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.0% | -13.1% | +5411.8% | +1231.8% | +517.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.7% | +8.4% | +38.5% | +62.8% | +61.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIRI and VSEC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSEC's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VSEC currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.14x | 0.95x | 1.84x | 1.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.17 | $17.73 | $49.31 | $134.00 | $232.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.77 | $13.04 | $32.43 | $32.85 | $121.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +83.3% | +84.0% | +42.5% | +85.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 51.5 | 46.5 | 38.8 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 2.2M | 1.1M | 4.3M | 662K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIRI and DRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAYW as "Hold", DRS as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy", VSEC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 94.0% upside for KTOS (target: $111) vs 6.7% for HAYW (target: $16). For income investors, DRS offers the higher dividend yield at 0.86% vs VSEC's 0.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.75 | $53.00 | $110.58 | $235.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 9 | 22 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.36 | — | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HAYW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DRS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
AIRI vs HAYW vs DRS vs KTOS vs VSEC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for VSE Corporation (VSEC). Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC?
On trailing P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, Hayward Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hayward Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC?
Over the past 5 years, VSE Corporation (VSEC) delivered a total return of +358.
5%, compared to -76. 8% for Air Industries Group (AIRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 1% versus AIRI's -94. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Industries Group (AIRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
91β versus VSE Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning VSEC is approximately 114% more volatile than AIRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 186% for Air Industries Group — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 3. 0% for VSE Corporation (VSEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VSE Corporation grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSEC leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC?
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -2. 5% for Air Industries Group — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAYW leads at 21. 1% versus 0. 8% for AIRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAYW leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 73. 5x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 56. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 94. 0% to $110. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC?
In this comparison, DRS (0.
9% yield), VSEC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AIRI, HAYW, KTOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIRI or HAYW or DRS or KTOS or VSEC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 0. 9% yield). VSE Corporation (VSEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRS: +54. 1%, VSEC: +517. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIRI and HAYW and DRS and KTOS and VSEC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VSEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DRS pays a dividend while AIRI, HAYW, KTOS, VSEC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.