Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRI vs KTOS vs AVAV vs DRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
AIRI vs KTOS vs AVAV vs DRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $15M | $10.68B | $8.40B | $11.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $1.42B | $1.61B | $3.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $29M | $-224M | $290M |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 18.3% | 21.8% | 24.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.0% | 1.8% | -8.3% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 73.5x | 58.4x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $180M | $64M | $470M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $753K | $561M | $41M | $647M |
AIRI vs KTOS vs AVAV vs DRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air Industries Group (AIRI) | 100 | 29.6 | -70.4% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 307.3 | +207.3% |
| AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) | 100 | 237.4 | +137.4% |
| Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) | 100 | 828.8 | +728.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRI vs KTOS vs AVAV vs DRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.91
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 1.43x
- Beta 0.91 vs KTOS's 1.84
KTOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs AIRI's 7.0%
- +58.1% vs AIRI's -14.2%
AVAV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.52x
DRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 54.1% 10Y total return vs KTOS's 12.3%
- Lower P/E (33.0x vs 58.4x)
- 7.8% margin vs AVAV's -13.9%
- 0.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs AIRI's 7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.0x vs 58.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs AVAV's -13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs KTOS's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs AIRI's -14.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs AVAV's -5.0%, ROIC 10.5% vs 3.6% |
AIRI vs KTOS vs AVAV vs DRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AIRI vs KTOS vs AVAV vs DRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DRS leads in 2 of 6 categories
AIRI leads 2 • KTOS leads 0 • AVAV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 73.9x AIRI's $50M. DRS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVAV's -13.9%. On growth, AVAV holds the edge at +143.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $72M | $82M | $436M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $29M | -$224M | $290M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$133M | -$183M | $397M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +18.3% | +21.8% | +24.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +1.8% | -8.3% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +2.1% | -13.9% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | -9.4% | -11.3% | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.9% | +22.6% | +143.4% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.2% | +133.3% | -51.5% | +21.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AIRI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.2x trailing earnings, DRS trades at a 91% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AIRI's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KTOS's 118.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $10.7B | $8.4B | $11.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42M | $10.3B | $8.4B | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.51x | 438.46x | 108.50x | 40.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 73.49x | 58.41x | 33.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.36x | 118.42x | 102.96x | 24.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 7.93x | 10.23x | 3.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 4.94x | 5.34x | 4.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 48.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-6 for AVAV. AVAV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIRI's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRS scores 7/9 vs AVAV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.0% | +1.3% | -6.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +1.0% | -5.0% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +1.4% | +3.6% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | +1.5% | +4.5% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.86x | 0.09x | 0.07x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | -$381M | $23M | -$177M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $753,000 | $561M | $41M | $647M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $180M | $64M | $470M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.10x | 6.16x | -5.99x | 40.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KTOS and DRS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DRS five years ago would be worth $33,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,316 for AIRI. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +58.1% total return vs AIRI's -14.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs AIRI's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.0% | -28.1% | -34.4% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.2% | +58.1% | +5.1% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.9% | +331.5% | +63.1% | +165.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +110.3% | +53.7% | +231.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.0% | +1231.8% | +498.3% | +5411.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.7% | +62.8% | +17.7% | +38.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIRI and DRS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTOS's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DRS currently trades 84.0% from its 52-week high vs AVAV's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.84x | 1.57x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.17 | $134.00 | $417.86 | $49.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.77 | $32.85 | $155.69 | $32.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +42.5% | +40.2% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 38.8 | 39.8 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 4.3M | 1.7M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
AIRI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KTOS as "Buy", AVAV as "Buy", DRS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.3% upside for AVAV (target: $344) vs 27.9% for DRS (target: $53). DRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $110.58 | $343.60 | $53.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 28 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
DRS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AIRI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
AIRI vs KTOS vs AVAV vs DRS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Air Industries Group (AIRI). Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) offers the better valuation at 40. 2x trailing P/E (33. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS?
On trailing P/E, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is the cheapest at 40. 2x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, Leonardo DRS, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS?
Over the past 5 years, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) delivered a total return of +231. 9%, compared to -76. 8% for Air Industries Group (AIRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 1% versus AIRI's -94. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Industries Group (AIRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
91β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning KTOS is approximately 103% more volatile than AIRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 186% for Air Industries Group — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 7. 0% for Air Industries Group (AIRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Air Industries Group grew EPS 36. 9% year-over-year, compared to -28. 9% for AeroVironment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVAV leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS?
Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -2. 5% for Air Industries Group — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DRS leads at 9. 5% versus 0. 8% for AIRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVAV leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) trades at 33. 0x forward P/E versus 73. 5x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 3% to $343. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS?
In this comparison, DRS (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. AIRI, KTOS, AVAV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIRI or KTOS or AVAV or DRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 0. 9% yield). AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DRS: +54. 1%, AVAV: +498. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIRI and KTOS and AVAV and DRS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DRS pays a dividend while AIRI, KTOS, AVAV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.