Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRJ vs GREE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
AIRJ vs GREE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $211M | $19M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $60M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-927K | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -19.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $154K | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $9M |
AIRJ vs GREE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AirJoule Technologi… (AIRJ) | 100 | 35.6 | -64.4% |
| Greenidge Generatio… (GREE) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRJ vs GREE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.68
- EPS growth 117.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.68, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 7.83x
GREE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -62.9% 10Y total return vs AIRJ's -64.8%
- -15.4% NII/revenue growth vs AIRJ's -100.4%
- +29.0% vs AIRJ's -25.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -15.4% NII/revenue growth vs AIRJ's -100.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs GREE's -33.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.68 vs GREE's 3.33 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs AIRJ's -25.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.2% ROA vs GREE's -3.2%, ROIC -45.3% vs -57.2% |
AIRJ vs GREE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AIRJ vs GREE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GREE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GREE and AIRJ operate at a comparable scale, with $60M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $60M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$926,770 | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -33.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -37.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -110.9% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GREE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $211M | $19M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $183M | $79M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.86x | -0.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AIRJ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AIRJ scores 4/9 vs GREE's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.3% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.6% | -23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $154,229 | $68M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AIRJ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIRJ five years ago would be worth $3,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $82 for GREE. Over the past 12 months, GREE leads with a +29.0% total return vs AIRJ's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AIRJ at -30.4% vs GREE's -33.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.9% | -25.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.8% | +29.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | -71.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | -62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.4% | -33.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AIRJ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIRJ is the less volatile stock with a 1.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GREE's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 3.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.75 | $2.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +50.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.2 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 351K | 138K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AIRJ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GREE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
AIRJ vs GREE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRJ or GREE a better buy right now?
AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) offers the better valuation at 0.
9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIRJ or GREE?
Over the past 5 years, AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) delivered a total return of -64.
8%, compared to -99. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GREE returned -62. 9% versus AIRJ's -64. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIRJ or GREE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
68β versus Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning GREE is approximately 98% more volatile than AIRJ relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — AIRJ or GREE?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AirJoule Technologies Corporation grew EPS 117.
5% year-over-year, compared to 57. 6% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AIRJ or GREE?
AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -33. 2% for Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIRJ leads at 0. 0% versus -19. 2% for GREE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GREE leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AIRJ or GREE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AIRJ or GREE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AirJoule Technologies Corporation (AIRJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Greenidge Generation Holdings Inc. (GREE) carries a higher beta of 3. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIRJ: -64. 8%, GREE: -62. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AIRJ and GREE?
These companies operate in different sectors (AIRJ (Industrials) and GREE (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AIRJ is a small-cap deep-value stock; GREE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.