AKAM vs FSLY

For growth investors, Fastly, Inc.

(FSLY) is the stronger pick with 7. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) a "Hold" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Akamai Technologies, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 17. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) delivered a total return of +8. 7%, compared to -44. 3% for Fastly, Inc. (FSLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AKAM returned +138. 2% versus FSLY's +34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Fastly, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FSLY is approximately 30% more volatile than AKAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 95% for Akamai Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fastly, Inc.

(FSLY) is pulling ahead at 7. 4% versus 4. 7% for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Akamai Technologies, Inc. grew EPS -7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 7% for Fastly, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLY leads at 15. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 7% net margin versus -29. 1% for Fastly, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AKAM leads at 13. 4% versus -30. 9% for FSLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AKAM leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 121. 3x for Fastly, Inc. — 104. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AKAM: -5. 7% to $111. 18.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Akamai Technologies, Inc.

(AKAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), +138. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AKAM: +138. 2%, FSLY: +34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.