ALH
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$31M
5Y Perf.+0.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ALH vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+10.5%
ALH vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ALH | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $31M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $118M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 37.1% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.7x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.63B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $86.81B |
Quick Verdict: ALH vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMZN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ALH
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick
ALH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.34, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, current ratio 1.40x
- Beta 1.34, yield 100.0%, current ratio 1.40x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ALH's 1.2%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs ALH's 10.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AMZN | 12.4% revenue growth vs ALH's 10.5% |
| Value | ALH | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 34.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs ALH's 7.1% |
| Stability / Safety | ALH | Beta 1.34 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | ALH | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +43.7% vs ALH's +1.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs ALH's 4.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs 10.2% |
ALH vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
ALH vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGALH
ALHAlliance Laundry Hold…
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ALHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ALH5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ALH and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 444.9x ALH's $1.7B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALH's 7.1%.
| Metric | ALHAlliance Laundry … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $413M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $118M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $145M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.1% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | +74.8% |
Evenly matched — ALH and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ALH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, ALH trades at a 99% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALH's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | ALHAlliance Laundry … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.31x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.66x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.48x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.30x | 378.98x |
ALH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALH delivers a 71.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $72 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN.
| Metric | ALHAlliance Laundry … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +71.9% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,121 for ALH. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs ALH's +1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs ALH's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ALHAlliance Laundry … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.4% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.2% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +36.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALH and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALH is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs ALH's 91.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ALHAlliance Laundry … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.48 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.64 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 904K | 45.5M |
Evenly matched — ALH and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALH as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for ALH (target: $32) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). ALH is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ALHAlliance Laundry … | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.80 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $216.62 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ALH vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALH or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 5% for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH). Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALH or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALH or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to +1. 2% for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus ALH's +1. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALH or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 13% more volatile than ALH relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ALH or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 10. 5% for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to 11. 0% for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALH or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 6. 5% for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALH leads at 19. 3% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALH or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALH: 26. 6% to $31. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALH or AMZN?
In this comparison, ALH (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALH or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (100. 0% yield). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALH: +1. 2%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALH and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALH is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. ALH pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ALH: 13.9% · AMZN: 16.6%)Net Margin>
%
(ALH: 7.1% · AMZN: 12.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ALH: 0.3x · AMZN: 37.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.