Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALH vs SWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
ALH vs SWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $31M | $12.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $15.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $118M | $371M |
| Gross Margin | 37.1% | 30.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 7.8% |
| Forward P/E | 21.7x | 17.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.63B | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $188M | $280M |
Quick Verdict: ALH vs SWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.34, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth 11.0%
- 1.2% 10Y total return vs SWK's -1.5%
SWK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 21.7x)
- +41.7% vs ALH's +1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs SWK's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SWK's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.7% vs ALH's +1.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 10.2% vs 5.8% |
ALH vs SWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALH vs SWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 9.1x ALH's $1.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.1% (ALH) to 2.4% (SWK). On growth, ALH holds the edge at +13.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $15.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $413M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $118M | $371M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $145M | $726M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.1% | +30.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +7.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.3% | -35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ALH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, ALH trades at a 99% valuation discount to SWK's 30.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALH's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SWK's 11.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $18.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.31x | 30.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.66x | 17.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.48x | 11.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 0.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.30x | 18.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALH leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALH delivers a 71.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $72 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +71.9% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $188M | $280M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALH and SWK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALH five years ago would be worth $10,121 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, SWK leads with a +41.7% total return vs ALH's +1.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWK at 2.2% vs ALH's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.4% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.2% | +41.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +6.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | -56.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | -1.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ALH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALH is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALH currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs SWK's 85.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.48 | $93.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.64 | $58.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +85.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.9 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 904K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALH and SWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALH as "Hold" and SWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.6% upside for ALH (target: $32) vs 11.2% for SWK (target: $89). For income investors, ALH offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs SWK's 4.10%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.80 | $89.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $216.62 | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +0.1% |
ALH leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
ALH vs SWK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALH or SWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALH or SWK?
On trailing P/E, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. at 30. 3x. On forward P/E, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALH or SWK?
Over the past 5 years, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) delivered a total return of +1. 2%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALH returned +1. 2% versus SWK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALH or SWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 37% more volatile than ALH relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ALH or SWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to 11. 0% for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALH or SWK?
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus 2. 7% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALH leads at 19. 3% versus 7. 6% for SWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALH leads at 33. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALH or SWK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
(SWK) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALH: 26. 6% to $31. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALH or SWK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. (ALH) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 4. 1% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK).
09Is ALH or SWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc.
(ALH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (100. 0% yield). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALH: +1. 2%, SWK: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALH and SWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALH (Consumer Cyclical) and SWK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.