Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALLT vs RBBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
ALLT vs RBBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $302M | $472M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $102M | $826M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $31M |
| Gross Margin | 70.3% | 48.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | -0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 24.8x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $405M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $96M |
ALLT vs RBBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | 100 | 71.7 | -28.3% |
| Ribbon Communicatio… (RBBN) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALLT vs RBBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALLT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 153.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.0%
- 62.8% 10Y total return vs RBBN's -68.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.35, Low D/E 9.8%, current ratio 2.65x
RBBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.49
- Beta 1.49, current ratio 1.44x
- Lower P/E (20.7x vs 24.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs RBBN's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.7x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs ALLT's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs ALLT's 2.35 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.7% vs RBBN's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs ALLT's 2.1%, ROIC 2.1% vs 2.9% |
ALLT vs RBBN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALLT vs RBBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBBN is the larger business by revenue, generating $826M annually — 8.1x ALLT's $102M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (RBBN) to 3.6% (ALLT). On growth, ALLT holds the edge at +14.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $102M | $826M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.3% | +48.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | -0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | -10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RBBN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, RBBN trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALLT's 95.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RBBN's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALLT's 38.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $302M | $472M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $293M | $781M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 95.39x | 12.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.83x | 20.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 38.27x | 9.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.12x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.51x | 18.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RBBN delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for ALLT. ALLT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBBN's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALLT scores 7/9 vs RBBN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +7.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $309M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $405M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALLT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALLT five years ago would be worth $4,224 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,899 for RBBN. Over the past 12 months, ALLT leads with a +33.7% total return vs RBBN's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALLT at 39.6% vs RBBN's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.7% | -11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.2% | +1.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.8% | -61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.8% | -68.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.6% | +0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALLT and RBBN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBBN is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALLT's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.35x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.92 | $4.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.67 | $1.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +62.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.8 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 410K | 879K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALLT as "Buy" and RBBN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 91.8% upside for ALLT (target: $15) vs 30.1% for RBBN (target: $4).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.67 | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% |
ALLT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RBBN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ALLT vs RBBN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALLT or RBBN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allot Ltd.
(ALLT) is the stronger pick with 10. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN). Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allot Ltd. (ALLT) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALLT or RBBN?
On trailing P/E, Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the cheapest at 12. 2x versus Allot Ltd. at 95. 4x. On forward P/E, Ribbon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALLT or RBBN?
Over the past 5 years, Allot Ltd.
(ALLT) delivered a total return of -57. 8%, compared to -61. 0% for Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLT returned +62. 8% versus RBBN's -68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALLT or RBBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus Allot Ltd. 's 2. 35β — meaning ALLT is approximately 57% more volatile than RBBN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Allot Ltd. (ALLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 90% for Ribbon Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALLT or RBBN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allot Ltd.
(ALLT) is pulling ahead at 10. 6% versus 1. 3% for Ribbon Communications Inc. (RBBN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ribbon Communications Inc. grew EPS 171. 0% year-over-year, compared to 153. 5% for Allot Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBBN leads at 1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALLT or RBBN?
Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Allot Ltd. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLT leads at 3. 5% versus 2. 4% for RBBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLT leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALLT or RBBN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Allot Ltd. — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLT: 91. 8% to $14. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALLT or RBBN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ALLT or RBBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ribbon Communications Inc.
(RBBN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Allot Ltd. (ALLT) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBBN: -68. 2%, ALLT: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALLT and RBBN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALLT (Technology) and RBBN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALLT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RBBN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.