ALNT
Allient Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$1.55B
5Y Perf.+158.8%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisALNT
EMR
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ALNT vs EMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$80.13B
5Y Perf.+130.6%
ALNT vs EMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  ALNT |  EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $80.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $561M | $18.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $2.44B |
| Gross Margin | 31.2% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 36.2x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $197M | $13.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $1.54B |
ALNT vs EMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ALNT
EMR
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allient Inc. (ALNT) | 100 | 258.8 | +158.8% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 230.6 | +130.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALNT vs EMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EMR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Allient Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇EMR emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ALNT
Allient Inc.
The Growth Play
ALNT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 67.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 314.8% 10Y total return vs EMR's 216.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.10, Low D/E 65.3%, current ratio 3.66x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
The Income Pick
EMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 54 yrs, beta 1.61, yield 1.5%
- PEG 4.87 vs ALNT's 5.32
- Beta 1.61, yield 1.5%, current ratio 0.88x
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  ALNT | 4.6% revenue growth vs EMR's 3.0% |
| Value |  EMR | Lower P/E (22.0x vs 36.2x), PEG 4.87 vs 5.32 |
| Quality / Margins | EMR | 13.3% margin vs ALNT's 4.3% |
| Stability / Safety | EMR | Beta 1.61 vs ALNT's 2.10 |
| Dividends | EMR | 1.5% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs ALNT's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ALNT | +166.9% vs EMR's +14.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EMR | 5.8% ROA vs ALNT's 4.1%, ROIC 8.2% vs 7.7% |
ALNT vs EMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
ALNT vs EMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEMRLAGGINGALNT
ALNTAllient Inc.
1leads
EMREmerson Electric Co.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ALNTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EMR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
EMR6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EMR6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ALNT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
EMR2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.3B annually — 32.7x ALNT's $561M. EMR is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALNT's 4.3%.
| Metric | ALNTAllient Inc. | EMREmerson Electric … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $561M | $18.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $41M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | +28.2% |
EMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
EMR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.4x trailing earnings, EMR trades at a 49% valuation discount to ALNT's 69.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EMR offers better value at 7.84x vs ALNT's 10.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ALNTAllient Inc. | EMREmerson Electric … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $80.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $92.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 69.22x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.19x | 21.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 10.18x | 7.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.27x | 18.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.80x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.07x | 3.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.26x | 30.05x |
EMR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EMR delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for ALNT. ALNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.65x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EMR's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMR scores 7/9 vs ALNT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ALNTAllient Inc. | EMREmerson Electric … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $156M | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $197M | $13.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.31x | 6.46x |
EMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALNT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNT five years ago would be worth $25,019 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,772 for EMR. Over the past 12 months, ALNT leads with a +166.9% total return vs EMR's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALNT at 33.3% vs EMR's 21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ALNTAllient Inc. | EMREmerson Electric … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +64.5% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +166.9% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.9% | +77.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.2% | +57.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +314.8% | +216.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.3% | +21.1% |
ALNT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALNT and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALNT's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALNT currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs EMR's 86.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ALNTAllient Inc. | EMREmerson Electric … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.65 | $165.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.02 | $122.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.7 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 217K | 2.5M |
Evenly matched — ALNT and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
EMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALNT as "Buy" and EMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for EMR (target: $164) vs -15.9% for ALNT (target: $77). For income investors, EMR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.47% vs ALNT's 0.13%.
| Metric | ALNTAllient Inc. | EMREmerson Electric … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.80 | $163.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 54 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $2.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
EMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EMR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ALNT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallEmerson Electric Co. (EMR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ALNT vs EMR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALNT or EMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allient Inc.
(ALNT) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) offers the better valuation at 35. 4x trailing P/E (22. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allient Inc. (ALNT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALNT or EMR?
On trailing P/E, Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the cheapest at 35. 4x versus Allient Inc. at 69. 2x. On forward P/E, Emerson Electric Co. is actually cheaper at 22. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Emerson Electric Co. wins at 4. 87x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALNT or EMR?
Over the past 5 years, Allient Inc.
(ALNT) delivered a total return of +150. 2%, compared to +57. 7% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNT returned +314. 8% versus EMR's +216. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALNT or EMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 61β versus Allient Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ALNT is approximately 30% more volatile than EMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Allient Inc. (ALNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 65% versus 68% for Emerson Electric Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALNT or EMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allient Inc.
(ALNT) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allient Inc. grew EPS 67. 1% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Emerson Electric Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMR leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALNT or EMR?
Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 7% net margin versus 4. 0% for Allient Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus 8. 7% for ALNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALNT or EMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 87x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) trades at 22. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 2x for Allient Inc. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 4% to $163. 62.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALNT or EMR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 1% for Allient Inc. (ALNT).
09Is ALNT or EMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield, +216. 5% 10Y return). Allient Inc. (ALNT) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EMR: +216. 5%, ALNT: +314. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALNT and EMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALNT (Technology) and EMR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
EMR pays a dividend while ALNT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.