Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ALRS vs BANF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
ALRS vs BANF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $774M | $3.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $330M | $824M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $241M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 82.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $441M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $227M |
ALRS vs BANF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alerus Financial Co… (ALRS) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 286.6 | +186.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALRS vs BANF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 2.7%
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -18.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 78.0%, current ratio 0.29x
BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 315.6% 10Y total return vs ALRS's 106.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs ALRS's 0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's -9.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs BANF's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 33-year raise streak, vs BANF's 1.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs BANF's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs ALRS's 0.6% |
ALRS vs BANF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALRS vs BANF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANF is the larger business by revenue, generating $824M annually — 2.5x ALRS's $330M. BANF is the more profitable business, keeping 29.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALRS's 8.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $330M | $824M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $326M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $241M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $237M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +82.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +29.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +28.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.1% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ALRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, BANF trades at a 63% valuation discount to ALRS's 44.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BANF's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALRS's 28.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $774M | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.56x | 16.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.33x | 15.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.78x | 11.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 4.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.16x | 16.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $5 for ALRS. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALRS's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANF scores 6/9 vs ALRS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $373M | -$93M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $441M | $134M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 0.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANF five years ago would be worth $19,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,474 for ALRS. Over the past 12 months, ALRS leads with a +44.4% total return vs BANF's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALRS at 21.6% vs BANF's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.9% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.4% | -4.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.7% | +32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | +90.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | +315.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ALRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANF's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.35 | $138.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.26 | $101.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +83.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.4 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 126K |
Analyst Outlook
ALRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALRS as "Hold" and BANF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for BANF (target: $125) vs -5.1% for ALRS (target: $29). For income investors, ALRS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.67% vs BANF's 1.58%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.75 | $125.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | $1.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
ALRS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). BANF leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
ALRS vs BANF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALRS or BANF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) is the stronger pick with -3.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). BancFirst Corporation (BANF) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALRS or BANF?
On trailing P/E, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the cheapest at 16.
3x versus Alerus Financial Corporation at 44. 6x. On forward P/E, Alerus Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALRS or BANF?
Over the past 5 years, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) delivered a total return of +90.
9%, compared to +4. 7% for Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +315. 6% versus ALRS's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALRS or BANF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus BancFirst Corporation's 0. 79β — meaning BANF is approximately 0% more volatile than ALRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 78% for Alerus Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALRS or BANF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) is pulling ahead at -3.
1% versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BancFirst Corporation grew EPS 10. 6% year-over-year, compared to -18. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALRS or BANF?
BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
2% net margin versus 5. 3% for Alerus Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BANF leads at 36. 8% versus 6. 9% for ALRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANF leads at 82. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALRS or BANF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) trades at 10.
3x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for BancFirst Corporation — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BANF: 7. 5% to $125. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALRS or BANF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 6% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is ALRS or BANF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 1. 6% yield, +315. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +315. 6%, ALRS: +106. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALRS and BANF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.