Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $774M | $3.94B | $2.52B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $330M | $824M | $902M | $826M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $241M | $169M | $254M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 82.9% | 73.6% | 71.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 36.8% | 24.3% | 37.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 15.9x | 11.5x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $441M | $134M | $327M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $227M | $185M | $1.08B |
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alerus Financial Co… (ALRS) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 286.6 | +186.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.3% vs BANF's 2.6%
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 16.5x)
- +44.4% vs FFIN's -5.5%
BANF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 315.6% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 108.5%
- PEG 0.84 vs FFIN's 3.67
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76 vs BANF's 0.79
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 13.5%
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's -9.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs BANF's -9.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs BANF's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ALRS's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.4% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs ALRS's 0.6% |
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • ALRS leads 1 • BANF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $902M annually — 2.7x ALRS's $330M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALRS's 8.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $330M | $824M | $902M | $826M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $326M | $241M | $320M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $241M | $169M | $254M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $95M | $237M | $225M | $283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +82.9% | +73.6% | +71.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +36.8% | +24.3% | +37.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +29.2% | +18.8% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +28.7% | +24.9% | +34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.1% | +5.7% | +39.5% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 68% valuation discount to ALRS's 44.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANF offers better value at 0.87x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $774M | $3.9B | $2.5B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $3.8B | $2.7B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.56x | 16.33x | 14.47x | 19.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.33x | 15.90x | 11.54x | 16.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.87x | 2.06x | 4.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.78x | 11.81x | 11.03x | 11.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.36x | 4.78x | 2.90x | 5.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 2.13x | 1.29x | 2.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.16x | 16.64x | 11.49x | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $5 for ALRS. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALRS's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs ALRS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +13.7% | +9.5% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +12.3% | +7.9% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.8% | +3.6% | +2.4% | +16.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.07x | 0.17x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $373M | -$93M | $142M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $227M | $185M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $441M | $134M | $327M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.35x | 0.98x | 1.05x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANF five years ago would be worth $19,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, ALRS leads with a +44.4% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALRS at 21.6% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.9% | +9.7% | +17.6% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.4% | -4.1% | +18.3% | -5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.7% | +32.1% | +48.5% | +24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | +90.9% | +44.4% | -25.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | +315.6% | +108.5% | +136.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.6% | +9.7% | +14.1% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BANF's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.79x | 0.76x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.35 | $138.77 | $48.27 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.26 | $101.48 | $39.20 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +83.8% | +99.8% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.4 | 59.6 | 63.1 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 154K | 126K | 266K | 683K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALRS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALRS as "Hold", BANF as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -5.1% for ALRS (target: $29). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs BANF's 1.58%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.75 | $125.00 | $46.00 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 3 | 10 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.6% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 33 | 30 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.81 | $1.83 | $1.43 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ALRS vs BANF vs NBTB vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Alerus Financial Corporation at 44. 6x. On forward P/E, Alerus Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BancFirst Corporation wins at 0. 84x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) delivered a total return of +90.
9%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +315. 6% versus ALRS's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus BancFirst Corporation's 0. 79β — meaning BANF is approximately 4% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for Alerus Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -9. 3% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to -18. 1% for Alerus Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus 5. 3% for Alerus Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus 6. 9% for ALRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANF leads at 82. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alerus Financial Corporation (ALRS) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 6% for BancFirst Corporation (BANF).
09Is ALRS or BANF or NBTB or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 1. 6% yield, +315. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANF: +315. 6%, ALRS: +106. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALRS and BANF and NBTB and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.