Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALSN vs ASTE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
ALSN vs ASTE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.62B | $1.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.65B | $1.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $543M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 40.8% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.1% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $2.92B | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.50B | $72M |
ALSN vs ASTE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 338.5 | +238.5% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 126.2 | +26.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALSN vs ASTE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 0.8%
- 386.6% 10Y total return vs ASTE's 22.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 4.85x
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7%
- +41.9% vs ALSN's +32.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs ASTE's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs ASTE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ASTE's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.9% vs ALSN's +32.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs ASTE's 2.0%, ROIC 22.2% vs 6.2% |
ALSN vs ASTE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALSN vs ASTE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 2.5x ASTE's $1.5B. ALSN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASTE's 1.7%. On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $970M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $543M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $713M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.8% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.6% | +20.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.4% | -90.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ALSN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.4x trailing earnings, ALSN trades at a 45% valuation discount to ASTE's 31.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALSN's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASTE's 14.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.6B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.0B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.42x | 31.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.11x | 14.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.98x | 14.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.81x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.36x | 57.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $4 for ASTE. ASTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALSN scores 6/9 vs ASTE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.5% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.2% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $320M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 64.20x | 5.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALSN five years ago would be worth $29,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,298 for ASTE. Over the past 12 months, ASTE leads with a +41.9% total return vs ALSN's +32.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALSN at 39.6% vs ASTE's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.4% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.6% | +41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.9% | +33.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | -17.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +386.6% | +22.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.6% | +10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ALSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALSN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALSN currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.42 | $65.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $76.01 | $36.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 830K | 232K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALSN and ASTE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALSN as "Hold" and ASTE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -9.2% upside for ALSN (target: $116) vs -32.8% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, ASTE offers the higher dividend yield at 0.96% vs ALSN's 0.84%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.00 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.07 | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | 0.0% |
ALSN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ALSN vs ASTE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALSN or ASTE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALSN or ASTE?
On trailing P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus Astec Industries, Inc. at 31. 9x. On forward P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALSN or ASTE?
Over the past 5 years, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) delivered a total return of +198. 2%, compared to -17. 0% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +386. 6% versus ASTE's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALSN or ASTE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning ASTE is approximately 48% more volatile than ALSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALSN or ASTE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 8% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTE leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALSN or ASTE?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 2. 8% for Astec Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 4. 6% for ASTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALSN or ASTE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for Astec Industries, Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALSN: -9. 2% to $116. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALSN or ASTE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN).
09Is ALSN or ASTE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 8% yield, +386. 6% 10Y return). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +386. 6%, ASTE: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALSN and ASTE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALSN (Consumer Cyclical) and ASTE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.