Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALTG vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
ALTG vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $267M | $769M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.84B | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-69M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 25.9% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $340M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $2M |
ALTG vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Equipment Grou… (ALTG) | 100 | 123.9 | +23.9% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 139.2 | +39.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALTG vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALTG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -2.2%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- -2.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- Better valuation composite
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.7%
- 187.9% 10Y total return vs ALTG's -7.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs ALTG's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ALTG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ALTG's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.2% vs KFRC's +16.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs ALTG's -5.1%, ROIC 19.1% vs 2.2% |
ALTG vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALTG vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALTG and KFRC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.8B and $1.3B in trailing revenue. KFRC is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALTG's -3.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$69M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$42M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.6% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ALTG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALTG's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KFRC's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $267M | $769M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $588M | $836M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.25x | 21.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.33x | 15.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.09x | 16.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ALTG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALTG scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.1% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $321M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $340M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,200 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,827 for ALTG. Over the past 12 months, ALTG leads with a +75.2% total return vs KFRC's +16.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFRC at -5.6% vs ALTG's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +65.7% | +35.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.2% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.8% | -15.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.7% | -18.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.4% | +187.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.3% | -5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALTG and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALTG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALTG currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs KFRC's 88.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.99 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.16 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +88.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 71.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 209K | 307K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALTG as "Buy" and KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.9% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -0.6% for ALTG (target: $8). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.68% vs ALTG's 1.10%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +6.6% |
KFRC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALTG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ALTG vs KFRC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALTG or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alta Equipment Group Inc.
(ALTG) is the stronger pick with -2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ALTG or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -18. 0%, compared to -31. 7% for Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +187. 9% versus ALTG's -7. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ALTG or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Alta Equipment Group Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning ALTG is approximately 335% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ALTG or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alta Equipment Group Inc.
(ALTG) is pulling ahead at -2. 2% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kforce Inc. grew EPS -25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 1% for Alta Equipment Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALTG leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ALTG or KFRC?
Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alta Equipment Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KFRC leads at 3. 8% versus 1. 3% for ALTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFRC leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ALTG or KFRC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 68.
9% to $71. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ALTG or KFRC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 1. 1% for Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG).
08Is ALTG or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 7% yield, +187. 9% 10Y return). Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +187. 9%, ALTG: -7. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ALTG and KFRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALTG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare KFRC vs KELYA
KELYA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to KFRC.
Compare ALTG vs RUSHA
RUSHA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ALTG.
Expand With KELYA + RUSHA
KELYA and RUSHA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.