ALTI vs CNNE

For growth investors, Cannae Holdings, Inc.

(CNNE) is the stronger pick with -6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 2% for AlTi Global, Inc. (ALTI). Analysts rate AlTi Global, Inc. (ALTI) a "Strong Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Cannae Holdings, Inc.

(CNNE) delivered a total return of -60. 5%, compared to -60. 6% for AlTi Global, Inc. (ALTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNNE returned -18. 2% versus ALTI's -60. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cannae Holdings, Inc.

(CNNE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus AlTi Global, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning ALTI is approximately 15% more volatile than CNNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AlTi Global, Inc. (ALTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 33% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cannae Holdings, Inc.

(CNNE) is pulling ahead at -6. 4% versus -16. 2% for AlTi Global, Inc. (ALTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AlTi Global, Inc. grew EPS 52. 2% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Cannae Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AlTi Global, Inc.

(ALTI) is the more profitable company, earning -49. 8% net margin versus -99. 2% for Cannae Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -49. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNNE leads at -28. 2% versus -42. 0% for ALTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALTI leads at 17. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALTI: 135.

6% to $9. 00.

In this comparison, ALTI (2.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CNNE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, AlTi Global, Inc.

(ALTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALTI: -60. 8%, CNNE: -18. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ALTI (Financial Services) and CNNE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

ALTI pays a dividend while CNNE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.