AMAT vs LRCX

For growth investors, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is the stronger pick with 23.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) offers the better valuation at 47. 4x trailing P/E (37. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Applied Materials, Inc.

(AMAT) is the cheapest at 47. 4x versus Lam Research Corporation at 66. 5x. On forward P/E, Applied Materials, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Applied Materials, Inc. wins at 2. 16x versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 18x.

Over the past 5 years, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) delivered a total return of +357.

8%, compared to +220. 5% for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRCX returned +36. 5% versus AMAT's +20. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Applied Materials, Inc.

(AMAT) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 14β versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 54β — meaning LRCX is approximately 19% more volatile than AMAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 48% for Lam Research Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is pulling ahead at 23.

7% versus 4. 4% for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lam Research Corporation grew EPS 43. 1% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for Applied Materials, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMAT leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

1% net margin versus 24. 7% for Applied Materials, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LRCX leads at 32. 0% versus 29. 2% for AMAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LRCX leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 16x versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 18x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) trades at 37. 1x forward P/E versus 48. 8x for Lam Research Corporation — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LRCX: 5. 4% to $290. 65.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) offers the highest yield at 0. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRCX: +36. 5%, AMAT: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LRCX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.