Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMBO vs PRDO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMBO
Ambow Education Holding Ltd.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveAMEX • CN
Market Cap$301K
5Y Perf.-87.2%
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.16B
5Y Perf.+111.5%

AMBO vs PRDO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMBO logoAMBO
PRDO logoPRDO
IndustryEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training Services
Market Cap$301K$2.16B
Revenue (TTM)$60M$855M
Net Income (TTM)$12M$170M
Gross Margin40.1%51.8%
Operating Margin-22.5%24.3%
Forward P/E4.5x12.0x
Total Debt$7M$105M
Cash & Equiv.$831K$132M

AMBO vs PRDOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMBO
PRDO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ambow Education Hol… (AMBO)10012.8-87.2%
Perdoceo Education … (PRDO)100211.5+111.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMBO vs PRDO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRDO leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ambow Education Holding Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMBO
Ambow Education Holding Ltd.
The Value Play

AMBO is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.5x vs 12.0x)
  • 20.7% margin vs PRDO's 19.9%
  • 77.7% ROA vs PRDO's 13.2%, ROIC 0.6% vs 15.3%
Best for: value and quality
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
The Income Pick

PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
  • Rev growth 24.2%, EPS growth 10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs AMBO's -94.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRDO logoPRDO24.2% revenue growth vs AMBO's -86.2%
ValueAMBO logoAMBOLower P/E (4.5x vs 12.0x)
Quality / MarginsAMBO logoAMBO20.7% margin vs PRDO's 19.9%
Stability / SafetyPRDO logoPRDOBeta 0.48 vs AMBO's 0.91, lower leverage
DividendsPRDO logoPRDO1.6% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRDO logoPRDO+15.4% vs AMBO's -36.3%
Efficiency (ROA)AMBO logoAMBO77.7% ROA vs PRDO's 13.2%, ROIC 0.6% vs 15.3%

AMBO vs PRDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMBOAmbow Education Holding Ltd.
FY 2021
Educational programs and services
99.0%$828M
Intelligent program and services
1.0%$8M
PRDOPerdoceo Education Corporation
FY 2025
C T U
54.6%$462M
A I U S
26.8%$226M
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, LLC
18.6%$158M

AMBO vs PRDO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPRDOLAGGINGAMBO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

PRDO is the larger business by revenue, generating $855M annually — 14.2x AMBO's $60M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.7% (AMBO) to 19.9% (PRDO).

MetricAMBO logoAMBOAmbow Education H…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$60M$855M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$13M$247M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$12M$170M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$221M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.1%+51.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-22.5%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.7%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.1%+25.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.8%
PRDO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMBO leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 4.5x trailing earnings, AMBO trades at a 68% valuation discount to PRDO's 14.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMBO's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRDO's 9.0x.

MetricAMBO logoAMBOAmbow Education H…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
Market CapShares × price$301,346$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6M$2.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS4.49x14.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.14x8.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.03x2.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.74x2.34x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.97x
AMBO leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMBO delivers a 71.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $17 for PRDO. PRDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMBO's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRDO scores 7/9 vs AMBO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMBO logoAMBOAmbow Education H…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+71.0%+17.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+77.7%+13.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.6%+15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.8%+17.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.79x0.11x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M-$27M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$831,000$132M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$105M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-255.32x50.21x
PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $29,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $872 for AMBO. Over the past 12 months, PRDO leads with a +15.4% total return vs AMBO's -36.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs AMBO's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMBO logoAMBOAmbow Education H…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-24.5%+18.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.3%+15.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.3%+195.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%+198.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.9%+505.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-2.8%+43.5%
PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBO's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs AMBO's 31.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMBO logoAMBOAmbow Education H…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x0.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.75$38.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.47$26.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.3%+89.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.746.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K584K
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

PRDO is the only dividend payer here at 1.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAMBO logoAMBOAmbow Education H…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts9
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.56
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallPerdoceo Education Corporat… (PRDO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMBO vs PRDO: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMBO or PRDO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -86. 2% for Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO). Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMBO or PRDO?

On trailing P/E, Ambow Education Holding Ltd.

(AMBO) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation at 14. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMBO or PRDO?

Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +198.

5%, compared to -91. 3% for Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus AMBO's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMBO or PRDO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

48β versus Ambow Education Holding Ltd. 's 0. 91β — meaning AMBO is approximately 88% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 79% for Ambow Education Holding Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMBO or PRDO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.

2% versus -86. 2% for Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (AMBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perdoceo Education Corporation grew EPS 10. 5% year-over-year, compared to -97. 0% for Ambow Education Holding Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRDO leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMBO or PRDO?

Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

9% net margin versus 14. 4% for Ambow Education Holding Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus 1. 2% for AMBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — AMBO or PRDO?

In this comparison, PRDO (1.

6% yield) pays a dividend. AMBO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is AMBO or PRDO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

48), 1. 6% yield, +505. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +505. 6%, AMBO: -94. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between AMBO and PRDO?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMBO is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock. PRDO pays a dividend while AMBO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AMBO

High-Margin Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRDO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMBO and PRDO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMBO: -86.2% · PRDO: 4.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(AMBO: 20.7% · PRDO: 19.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AMBO: 4.5x · PRDO: 14.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.