Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMBP vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • LU
Market Cap$2.37B
5Y Perf.-60.7%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$340.74B
5Y Perf.+60.4%

AMBP vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMBP logoAMBP
KO logoKO
IndustryPackaging & ContainersBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$2.37B$340.74B
Revenue (TTM)$5.73B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$11M$13.70B
Gross Margin10.0%61.7%
Operating Margin4.9%29.3%
Forward P/E16.0x24.3x
Total Debt$4.42B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$522M$10.27B

AMBP vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMBP
KO
StockSep 20May 26Return
Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP)10039.3-60.7%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100160.4+60.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMBP vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMBP leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
The Income Pick

AMBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 11.0%
  • Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
  • Beta 0.81, yield 11.0%, current ratio 1.06x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 112.5% 10Y total return vs AMBP's -44.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.09, current ratio 1.46x
  • 27.8% margin vs AMBP's 0.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMBP logoAMBP12.0% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueAMBP logoAMBPLower P/E (16.0x vs 24.3x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs AMBP's 0.2%
DividendsAMBP logoAMBP11.0% yield, vs KO's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)AMBP logoAMBP+21.3% vs KO's +13.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.5%

AMBP vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMBPArdagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

AMBP vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGAMBP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 8.6x AMBP's $5.7B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.7B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$753M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$209M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.2%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.6%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.6%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.0%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMBP leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AMBP's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 25.4x.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$340.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.3B$376.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-215.76x26.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.03x24.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.48x25.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.43x7.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.95x64.34x
AMBP leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AMBP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.9B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$522M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.08x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — AMBP and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,233 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,413 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, AMBP leads with a +21.3% total return vs KO's +13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.5% vs KO's 10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.9%+15.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+21.3%+13.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.0%+33.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.9%+62.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.3%+112.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.5%+10.0%
Evenly matched — AMBP and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBP's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs AMBP's 78.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x-0.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.03$82.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.29$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.9%+96.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.958.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M13.4M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AMBP and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AMBP as "Hold" and KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.9% upside for AMBP (target: $5) vs 8.3% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.04% vs KO's 2.57%.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.52$85.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts648
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.0%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises035
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — AMBP and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMBP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMBP vs KO: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMBP or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 0x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMBP or KO?

On forward P/E, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMBP or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +62.

3%, compared to -45. 9% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +112. 5% versus AMBP's -44. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMBP or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

09β versus Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning AMBP is approximately -1021% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500.

05

Which is growing faster — AMBP or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. grew EPS 59. 3% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBP leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMBP or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMBP or KO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. (AMBP) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMBP: 13. 9% to $4. 52.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMBP or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP) offers the highest yield at 11. 0%, versus 2. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO).

09

Is AMBP or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

09), 2. 6% yield, +112. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 5%, AMBP: -44. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMBP and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMBP (Consumer Cyclical) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AMBP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KO

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMBP and KO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMBP: 18.6% · KO: 12.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.